Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Henry W Harris Scholarship Foundation

$5k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Education$73kCivil Rights$25kHealth$17kPublic Benefit$15kYouth Development$11kPhilanthropy$4kReligion$2kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$105
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 48% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%THETIM WRIGHTMAN FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%TROOPSDIRECT INC: $2k → 9%KB CARES: $500 → 14%DALLAS STARS FOUNDATION: $34k → 5%KW CARES: $500 → 10%TOYS FOR TOTS: $5k → 11%SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $2k → 14%FREEDOM IS NOT FREE VETERANS HUNT: $10k → 14%CHAPLAINCY BENEVOLENT FUND: $1k → 14%RACETRACK CHURCH: $1k → 17%SACRED HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%WILLIAM JEWELL COLLEGE: $2k → 8%KENT GWALTNEY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIO: $5k → 13%MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%TIM WRIGHTMAN FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%DALLAS STARS FOUNDATION: $16k → 5%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $200 → 14%SEDALIA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%THE TIM WRIGHTMAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%DALLAS STARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 5%DALLAS POLICE WIDOWS AND CHILDREN F: $500 → 14%FRISCO FOOD BANK: $754 → 5%SALESMANSHIP CLUB OF DALLAS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$61k · 3 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
17

Total granted

$61k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+9%

Still filing today

100%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
EducationHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DALLAS STARS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $51k · revenue +129%
  • TW
    TIM WRIGHTMAN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $8k
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • FI
    FREEDOM IS NOT FREE
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • FI
    FREEDOM IS NOT FREE VETERANS HUNT
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pedi-Ortho Health Corporation

Pedi-ortho health corporation provides physicians who provide pediatric orthopaedic care to children and institutions with whom the organization contracts.

Health
2
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
3
Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
4
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
5
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
6
Driscoll Children's Hospital

Devoted to expert care, education, outreach and advocacy.

Health
7
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
8
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
9
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
10
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

11
Scott & White Hospital-Taylor

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children and the most unlike its peers is Sacred Heart Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE — $25,000 · OtherFREEDOM IS NOT FREEUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI — $13,329 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIFREEDOM IS NOT FREE VETERANS HUNT — $10,000 · OtherFREEDOM IS NOT FREE VETERANS HUNTKENT GWALTNEY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIO — $5,000 · OtherKENT GWALTNEY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIOTHE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherTHE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATIONTOYS FOR TOTS — $4,500 · OtherTOYS FOR TOTS+6 more — $4,754 · Other+6 moreDALLAS STARS FOUNDATION INC — $51,279 · EducationDALLAS STARS FOUNDATION INCWilliam Jewell College — $2,000 · EducationSACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthSACRED HE…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $2,200 · HealthTEXAS SCO…TIM WRIGHTMAN FOUNDATION — $7,900 · Recreation & SportsSalesmanship Club of Dallas — $5,000 · Community ImprovementTroops Direct — $2,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,800 · PhilanthropyKELLER WILLIAMS REALTY CARES — $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$67,583Education$53,279Health$12,200Recreation & Sports$7,900Community Improvement$5,000Philanthropy$3,800Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDALLAS STARS FOUNDATION INC — $51,279 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTroops Direct — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWilliam Jewell College — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKELLER WILLIAMS REALTY CARES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DALLAS STARS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TIM WRIGHTMAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
  • Who funds Troops Direct
  • Who funds William Jewell College
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY CARES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Henry W Harris Scholarship Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph