Skip to content
Henry Stuebner at a glance

· Private foundation

Henry Stuebner

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$128kHealth$125kYouth Development$60kEducation$53kReligion$36kHousing & Shelter$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,857
Median grant
2
States reached
$949k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPEPHL$3,857
HAYES HOME FOR MEN$3,857
INGLIS HOUSE$3,857
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$3,857
ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND$3,857
Individual grant recipient$3,857
THE AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL$3,857
ARDMORE HOUSING FOR ELDERLY INC$3,857
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$3,857
WOMEN'S WAY$3,857
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$3,857
LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES EAST$3,850
GERMANTOWN HOME$1,928
SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL$1,928
LUTHERAN HOME$7
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL: $2k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL: $2k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL: $2k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL: $2k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL: $2k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL: $2k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL: $2k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL: $2k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS-MRTN LTHR SCHOOL: $2k → 7%HOPEPHL: $4k → 22%HOPEPHL: $4k → 22%HOPEPHL: $3k → 22%INGLIS HOUSE: $5k → 22%INGLIS HOUSE: $5k → 22%INGLIS HOUSE: $4k → 22%INGLIS HOUSE: $4k → 22%INGLIS HOUSE: $4k → 22%INGLIS HOUSE: $4k → 22%INGLIS HOUSE: $4k → 22%INGLIS HOUSE: $3k → 22%INGLIS HOUSE: $3k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $5k → 22%ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 22%ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $5k → 22%ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $4k → 22%ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $4k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $4k → 22%ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $4k → 22%ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $4k → 22%ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $3k → 22%ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 22%ASSOCIATION SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$460k · 17 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against -48% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$460k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-48%

Still filing today

59%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WW
    WOMENS WAY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +122%
  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +73% · 39% of their budget
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • LS
    LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES EAST
    one grant, 2025 · $4k · revenue -48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
2
Elwyn of Pennsylvania and Delaware

Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.

Human Services
3
Inglis Housing Corporation

To provide affordable, accessible and safe housing for people with physical disabilities where they enjoy an environment of independence and mobility, achieve their goals and live life to the fullest.

Housing & Shelter
4
Inglis Foundation

The inglis foundation's mission is to enable people with disabilities, and those who care for them, to achieve their goals and live life to the fullest. inglis partners with the disability community to provide practical solutions that…

Human Services
5
Inglis Community Services Inc

Inglis' mission is to enable people with disabilities - and those who care for them - to achieve their goals and live life to the fullest.

Human Services
6
Holy Redeemer Health System

As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.

Health
7
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
8
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
9
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
10
Geisinger Health Plan

Geisinger health plan strives to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health care to the community through equitable, innovative,and inclusive care and coverage models.

—
11
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
12
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hopephl; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAYES HOME FOR MEN: $36,222 · OtherHAYES HOME FOR MENLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $35,614 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORIndividual grant recipient: $35,614 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $35,614 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONLUTHERAN HOME: $31,764 · OtherLUTHERAN HOMEYOUTH SERVICE INC: $24,367 · OtherYOUTH SERVICE INCSAUNDERS HOUSE: $20,520 · OtherSAUNDERS HOUSE+1 more: $6,524 · OtherINGLIS HOUSE: $35,614 · Human ServicesINGLIS HOUSEWOMENS WAY: $35,614 · Human ServicesWOMENS WAYVisionLink: $35,614 · Human ServicesVisionLinkGemma Services: $17,806 · Human ServicesGemma ServicesHOPEPHL: $11,247 · Human ServicesHOPEPHLThe American Oncologic Hospital: $29,090 · HealthThe America…GERMANTOWN HOME: $17,806 · HealthGERMANTOWN …DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $35,614 · EducationARDMORE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $15,094 · Housing & ShelterLUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES EAST: $3,850 · Housing & Shelter
Other$226,239Human Services$135,895Health$46,896Education$35,614Housing & Shelter$18,944

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINGLIS HOUSE: $35,614 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS WAY: $35,614 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $35,614 over 9y, 39% of budgetVisionLink: $35,614 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $35,614 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Oncologic Hospital: $29,090 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE INC: $24,367 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGERMANTOWN HOME: $17,806 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGemma Services: $17,806 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetARDMORE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $15,094 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHOPEPHL: $11,247 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INGLIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS WAY ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds VisionLink ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The American Oncologic Hospital ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds GERMANTOWN HOME ↗
  • Who funds Gemma Services ↗
  • Who funds ARDMORE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEPHL ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES EAST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Henry Dolfinger 2 Tru…The Philadelphia Foun…Lindback Cr & Mf Foun…United Way of Greater…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust UwPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Philadelphia Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry Stuebner funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry Stuebner. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Henry Stuebner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home