Skip to content

· Private foundation

Henry J Fox Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
91
Grants FY2025still arriving
22
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$63kCivil Rights$33kHealth$27kReligion$25kCrime & Legal$23kArts & Culture$20kHuman Services$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 91 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k90 grants · $114k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$598k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$12,000
CWFA (CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA)$5,000
AID-ARKANSAS IMMIGRANT DEFENSE$5,000
CONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$3,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$3,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
COMPASSION WORKS FOR ALL$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREAT PLAINS$2,000
INTERFAITH WORKSCOMMUNITY MINISTRIES$2,000
ECOLOGY CNTR$2,000
GREAT OLD BROADS FOR WILDERNESS$2,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $150 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%LITTLE FALLS VILLAGE: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$383k · 85 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

85 repeat relationships: 63 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

85
31

Total granted

$383k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+7%

Still filing today

51%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +13%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +121%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • WW
    WHOLE WOMEN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • AA
    AJC ARKANSAS JUSTICE COLLECTIVE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth connects thinkers, doers, activists, and knowledge holders from around the world to solve humanity's greatest ecological challenges--together. Our belief is simple: The solutions to the climate crisis already exist. By connecting…

Environment
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
8
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
11
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Driftless Rivers National Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/67
Grantees still filing
44/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $21,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ISRAELEARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE: $15,500 · OtherAID-ARKANSAS IMMIGRANT DEFENSE: $12,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · Other+100 more: $237,600 · Other+100 moreENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $16,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $9,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB F…LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $8,500 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST OF…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $8,300 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOU…ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $5,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL…ECOLOGY CENTER: $2,000 · EnvironmentECOLOGY CENTER: $2,000 · EnvironmentNational Network of Abortion Funds: $2,000 · EnvironmentJENKINS ARBORETUM & GARDENS: $2,000 · Environment+2 more: $1,575 · EnvironmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,000 · InternationalA TOUCH OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $4,500 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $3,400 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $3,000 · International+3 more: $2,700 · InternationalGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,550 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE: $5,500 · Arts & CultureTREDYFFRIN TWP LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $1,750 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $600 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $5,800 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $4,700 · AnimalsGREEN AMERICA: $3,100 · AnimalsMUTTVILLE: $3,000 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $3,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,000 · Animals+1 more: $500 · AnimalsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $18,000 · Crime & LegalAbortion Fund of Ohio: $5,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $4,000 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 · HealthSJOGREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · HealthPREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Health
Other$298,850Environment$56,375International$34,100Arts & Culture$24,400Animals$21,100Crime & Legal$18,000Health$16,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH: $9,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $8,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $8,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $7,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $5,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAbortion Fund of Ohio: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $4,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA TOUCH OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS ABORTION SUPPORT NETWORK: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $3,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $3,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN AMERICA: $3,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSJOGREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVOTERIDERS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTERS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION WORKS FOR ALL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNational Network of Abortion Funds: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTREDYFFRIN TWP LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJENKINS ARBORETUM & GARDENS: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $1,625 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $1,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING LANDS & WATERS: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPREECLAMPSIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC TELEVISION 19 INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONTRA COSTA JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Abortion Fund of Ohio ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds A TOUCH OF LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY15.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Hopewell Fund · McKesson Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Impactassetsinc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry J Fox Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry J Fox Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Preeclampsia Foundation Inc: 9% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 145 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henry J Fox’s filings →

More from the funding graph