Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Henry H Uihlein (Sr) and Marion (Polly) S Uihlein Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$189k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0162% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$429kInternational$157kYouth Development$110kHuman Services$80kCivil Rights$15kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$486k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $147k
$18,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN$28,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC$25,000
SUPPORTERS OF OPERA SINGERS INC$22,000
YMCA OF METRO MILWAUKEE$18,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WI INC$18,000
WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC$18,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$18,000
HEAR WISCONSIN$7,000
CHARLES M BOESEL FOUNDATION - RED ARROW SCHOLARSHIP$7,000
MSU HILLEMAN SCHOLARS PROGRAM$7,000
SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC$7,000
MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION$7,000
4PAWS$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $5k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $4k → 9%SHARP LITERACY INC: $5k → 17%SHARP LITERACY INC: $5k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $6k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $6k → 17%PEACE LEARNING CENTER OF MILWAUKEE INC: $1k → 17%PEACE LEARNING CENTER OF MILWAUKEE INC: $1k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $7k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $7k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $7k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $6k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 22 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
0

Total granted

$1.3M
$0

Still filing today

68%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $202k · revenue +39%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $110k · revenue +21%
  • WQ
    WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $109k · revenue +236%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    The Madison Waldorf School Ltd

    The madison waldorf school is an independent day school located in madison wisconsin, and a developing member of the association of waldorf schools of north america.

    Education
    2
    Central City Cyberschool of Milwaukee Inc

    A charter school providing motivation to inner city children to promote a successful future

    Education
    3
    Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Milwaukee Inc

    The Y is the nation's leading nonprofit committed to strengthening communities through Youth Development, Healthy Living and Social Responsibility.

    Human Services
    4
    Smart Love Parenting Center

    To provide a variety of programs in the chicago area to help children, parents, and adults achieve greater inner well-being, sustain closer relationships, and have more pleasurable family, school, and work lives.

    Human Services
    5
    Children's Museum of Oak Park

    To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.

    Arts & Culture
    6
    Downtown Montessori Academy Inc

    To create a montessori environment where the child's early experiences with learning will help him or her to become a self-confident, competent, cooperative adult.

    Education
    7
    One City Schools Inc

    Our mission is to seed a new model of public education that ensures young children are on track to succeed in a college or career preparatory program from birth through high school graduation.

    Human Services
    8
    Wisconsin World Affairs Council Inc
    9
    Wisconsin Montessori Society Inc

    Mission: educating youngsters to become an informed, committed, and difference-making generation. vision: educating children to graduate as informed, engaged, ethically minded citizens of the world that they inherit. purpose: milwaukee…

    Education
    10
    Milwaukee Women Inc

    Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

    Education
    11
    Wisconsin Council On Economic Education Inc

    To enhance the quality and quantity of economics education in wisconsin.

    Social Science
    12
    Milwaukee Excellence Inc

    The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Peace Learning Center of Milwaukeeinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    15/15
    Grantees still filing
    11/15
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    SUPPORTERS OF OPERA SINGERS INC — $166,000 · OtherSUPPORTERS OF OPERA SINGERS INCYMCA OF METRO MILWAUKEE — $117,000 · OtherYMCA OF METRO MILWAUKEEMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION — $47,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSIONCHARLES M BOESEL FOUNDATION - RED ARROW SCHOLARSHIP — $47,000 · OtherCHARLES M BOESEL FOUNDATION - RED ARROW SC…SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC — $46,000 · OtherSUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC4PAWS — $32,000 · Other4PAWSMSU HILLEMAN SCHOLARS PROGRAM — $27,000 · OtherMSU HILLEMAN SCHOLARS PROGRAM+1 more — $4,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC — $202,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN I…WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC — $109,000 · HealthWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION IN…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $104,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EA…+2 more — $14,000 · HealthJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $157,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEV…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND …HEAR Wisconsin Inc — $47,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesSHARP LITERACY INC — $10,000 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $9,000 · Human Services+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesOUR NEXT GENERATION INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 · Recreation & Sports
    Other$486,000Health$429,000International$157,000Youth Development$110,000Human Services$80,000Civil Rights$15,000Recreation & Sports$9,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC — $202,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $157,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $110,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC — $109,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $104,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHEAR Wisconsin Inc — $47,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC — $46,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetOUR NEXT GENERATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHARP LITERACY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC
    • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
    • Who funds WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC
    • Who funds HEAR Wisconsin Inc
    • Who funds SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC
    • Who funds OUR NEXT GENERATION INC
    • Who funds SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC
    • Who funds SHARP LITERACY INC
    • Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    • Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC
    • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    • Who funds PEACE LEARNING CENTER OF MILWAUKEEINC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Henry H Uihlein (Sr) and Marion (Polly) S Uihlein Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Henry H Uihlein (Sr) and Marion (Polly) S Uihlein Foundation Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Henry H Uihlein (Sr) and Marion (Polly) S Uihlein Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph