Skip to content
Henry E & Annabel S Larzelere Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Henry E & Annabel S Larzelere Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$53kEducation$42kFood & Nutrition$24kRecreation & Sports$22kAnimals$22kHuman Services$20kHealth$19kInternational$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$698k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PEOPLES CHURCH OF EAST LANSING$3,000
PEOPLES CHURCH$3,000
CRESCENDO DETROIT$2,750
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$1,637
WEDU PBS$1,500
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$1,500
DAWG NATION HOCKEY FOUNDATION$1,167
ONE GOAT FOUNDATION$1,167
SUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY$1,166
MEALS ON WHEELS - ANDERSON$1,000
ACCEPT INSPIRE MINISTRIES$1,000
HOSPICE OF LANSING$1,000
MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA$1,000
SARASOTA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY$1,000
SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF HAWAII: $2k → 9%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2k → 9%TRUE NORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $500 → 13%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%CAMP NEWAYGO: $500 → 13%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 21%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%PINE REST FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
IA
IN
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
AR
TN
SC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$239k · 46 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
34

Total granted

$239k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+64%

Still filing today

54%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +98%
  • DN
    DAWG Nation Hockey Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +157%
  • RD
    REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • FI
    FONT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • SC
    SCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
8
National Wildlife Refuge Association

To conserve america's wildlife heritage for future generations through strategic programs that protect and enhance the national wildlife refuge system and the landscapes beyond its boundaries. by combining policy, landscape-scale…

Animals
9
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
10
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
36/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE PEOPLES CHURCH OF EAST LANSING: $37,400 · OtherTHE PEOPLES CHURCH OF EAST LANSINGMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $32,630 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYVENICE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB FND: $11,400 · OtherVENICE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB FNDIndividual grant recipient: $8,100 · Other+57 more: $105,250 · Other+57 moreREFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $8,900 · Human ServicesREFUGEE DEV…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,500 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…ANDERSON'S EMERGENCY KITCHEN INC: $3,950 · Human ServicesANDERSON'S …BIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $3,100 · Human ServicesBIG CAT RES…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,350 · Human ServicesTRUENORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,000 · Human ServicesPINE REST FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED: $9,875 · HealthSUNSHINE …DAWG Nation Hockey Foundation: $9,100 · HealthDAWG Nati…PINE REST CHRISTIAN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $1,350 · HealthNATIONAL PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,100 · HealthHOSPICE OF LANSING: $1,000 · HealthSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · Health+2 more: $1,000 · HealthFeeding America: $6,200 · Food & NutritionGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $4,100 · Food & NutritionHAND2HAND: $3,350 · Food & NutritionSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $900 · Food & NutritionPACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION: $5,100 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,725 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,200 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $1,800 · EnvironmentCRESCENDO DETROIT: $7,650 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $1,500 · Arts & CulturePHANTOM REGIMENT INC: $900 · Arts & CultureBLUE LAKE FINE ARTS CAMP: $600 · Arts & CultureASSOCIATION FOR DIPLOMATIC STUDIES AND TRAINING: $4,000 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $750 · InternationalUNKNOWN NATIONS: $700 · International
Other$194,780Human Services$28,800Health$25,425Food & Nutrition$14,550Environment$12,825Arts & Culture$10,650International$7,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED: $9,875 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDAWG Nation Hockey Foundation: $9,100 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetREFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $8,900 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRESCENDO DETROIT: $7,650 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFeeding America: $6,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION: $5,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $4,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR DIPLOMATIC STUDIES AND TRAINING: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON'S EMERGENCY KITCHEN INC: $3,950 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,725 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAND2HAND: $3,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY DETROIT: $3,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $3,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA INC: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUDIO SCRIPTURE MINISTRIES: $1,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPINE REST CHRISTIAN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGIRLS INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRUENORTH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $900 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPHANTOM REGIMENT INC: $900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNKNOWN NATIONS: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE LAKE FINE ARTS CAMP: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DAWG Nation Hockey Foundation ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENDO DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR DIPLOMATIC STUDIES AND TRAINING ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON'S EMERGENCY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HAND2HAND ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds BIG CAT RESCUE CORP ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Capital Region Commun…Charles Stewart Mott …Enterprise Holdings F…Community Foundation …Dart Foundation fka S…Barnabas FoundationConsumers Energy Foun…Spartannash FoundationArthur J Gallagher Fo…WK Kellogg FoundationMichigan Health Endow…Ford Philanthropy
Capital Region Community FoundationMI17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Capital Region Community Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Dart Foundation fka Solid Waste Management Foundation · Barnabas Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Spartannash Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Ford Philanthropy

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henry E & Annabel S Larzelere Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henry E & Annabel S Larzelere Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henry E & Annabel S Larzelere’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home