Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Henry and Eleanor Perciballi Charitable Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$260k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Arts & Culture$486kEducation$361kPublic Benefit$173kAnimals$96kHousing & Shelter$96k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$33,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY THEATRE LEAGUE INC$33,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF LYCOMING COUNTY INC$33,000
THE WILLIAMSPORT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$33,000
LYCOMING COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE$33,000
LYCOMING ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INC$33,000
JAMES V BROWN LIBRARY$33,000
THOMAS TABER MUSEUM$30,000
COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER$20,000
LYCOMING COLLEGE$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF LYCOMING COUNTY INC: $33k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF LYCOMING COUNTY INC: $33k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF LYCOMING COUNTY INC: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$1.2M
$17k

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JV
    JAMES V BROWN LIBRARY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $173k · revenue +6%
  • LC
    LYCOMING COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $107k · revenue +36%
  • LA
    LYCOMING ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $96k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • WC
    WILLIAMSPORT COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $17k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lycoming County Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Full-service animal shelter, animal care, adoptive services, humane investigaation services and humane education.

Animals
2
Williamsport Lycoming Arts Council

Lycoming arts works to create local and regional connections that generate awareness, opportunities, and support of the arts.

3
Lycoming County Fair Association

To provide and promote the areas agriculture, hotriculture, and mechanical exposition for the general public

Community Improvement
4
Taylor Community Library Association

Public lending library

5
Lilly Library Association

Provide library services

6
Lycoming Community Care Inc

Provided skilled and intermediate nursing care for approximately 49,004 resident days to the men and women of lycoming county and surrounding areas.

Health
7
Lycoming County Library System Board

The lycoming county library system is lycoming county's free information utility, lifelong learning center, and popular materials collective.

Education
8
Lynnville Area Arts Association Inc

To preserve the integrity of the pulaski opera house built in 1868 and to promote the performing arts in the pulaski area

Arts & Culture
9
Bellwood-Antis Public Library

Provide public library services

10
Williamsportlycoming Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is organized to advance the general welfare and prosperity of williamsport and lycoming county so that its business community and citizens shall prosper. promotion and advocacy shall be provided with particular attention and…

11
Lyons Public Library

Provide library materials and services to residents of lyons, ny and the surrounding area.

Education
12
Adamstown Area Library

The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is James V Brown Library and the most unlike its peers is Community Theatre League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LYCOMING COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE — $173,050 · OtherLYCOMING COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THEJAMES V BROWN LIBRARY — $173,050 · OtherJAMES V BROWN LIBRARYLYCOMING COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $107,050 · OtherLYCOMING COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY — $77,050 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYTHOMAS TABER MUSEUM — $63,000 · OtherTHOMAS TABER MUSEUM+1 more — $17,000 · OtherWILLIAMSPORT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $173,050 · Arts & CultureWILLIAMSPORT SYMPHONY ORCHE…COMMUNITY THEATRE LEAGUE INC — $96,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY THEATRE LEAGUE IN…COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER — $30,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY ARTS CENTERLYCOMING COLLEGE — $111,050 · EducationLYCOMING C…FAMILY PROMISE OF LYCOMING COUNTY INC — $96,000 · Human ServicesLYCOMING ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY — $96,000 · Animals
Other$610,200Arts & Culture$299,050Education$111,050Human Services$96,000Animals$96,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILLIAMSPORT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $173,050 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetJAMES V BROWN LIBRARY — $173,050 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetLYCOMING COLLEGE — $111,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLYCOMING COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $107,050 over 3y, 13% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LYCOMING COUNTY INC — $96,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY THEATRE LEAGUE INC — $96,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetLYCOMING ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY — $96,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY ARTS CENTER — $30,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLIAMSPORT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds JAMES V BROWN LIBRARY
  • Who funds LYCOMING COLLEGE
  • Who funds LYCOMING COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LYCOMING COUNTY INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY THEATRE LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds LYCOMING ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Community Foundation Partnership of PennsylvaniaPA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · Abram M Snyder Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Henry and Eleanor Perciballi Charitable Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph