Skip to content

· Private foundation

Henke Gordon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$177k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$805kHealth$30kCommunity Improvement$20kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$12kReligion$12kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$51,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$41,000
LYNN UNIVERSITY$26,000
PIUS XI HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$5,000
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$5,000
WCTC FOUNDATION INC$5,000
NATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY$5,000
NEXT 18$5,000
NATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY$5,000
EASTERSEALS FLORIDA$5,000
JESUITS USA MIDWEST PROVINCE$1,000
THE MACC FUND$1,000
WAR MEMORIAL CENTER$1,000
ST MARCUS SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEXT 18: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$890k · 25 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$890k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+172%

Still filing today

40%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $247k · revenue +24%
  • LU
    LYNN UNIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +18%
  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • VB
    Versiti Blood Reearch Institute
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • TS
    THE SCHOOL SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • FH
    Froedtert Hospital Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +172%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

—
3
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
4
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
7
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Partners Running Waters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $205,000 · OtherMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLCRISTO TEY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $105,000 · OtherCRISTO TEY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLNATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY INC: $92,500 · OtherNATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY INCPIUS XI HIGH SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherPIUS XI HIGH SCHOOL+15 more: $78,500 · Other+15 moreMarquette University: $247,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityLYNN UNIVERSITY INC: $31,000 · EducationLYNN UNIVERSITY INCTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $30,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC+1 more: $1,000 · EducationGLOBAL PARTNERS RUNNING WATERS INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $4,000 · Community ImprovementEASTER SEALS FLORIDA INC: $10,000 · HealthBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $2,000 · HealthFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $1,000 · HealthWCTC FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureNEXT 18 INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$541,000Education$309,000Community Improvement$24,000Health$13,000Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$9,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $247,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLYNN UNIVERSITY INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL PARTNERS RUNNING WATERS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetWCTC FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEASTER SEALS FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEXT 18 INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds LYNN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL PARTNERS RUNNING WATERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WCTC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXT 18 INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI27.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Mary Pauly Lacy Foundation Inc · Sensient Technologies Foundation Inc · Gardner Foundation · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Henke Gordon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Henke Gordon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lynn University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Henke Gordon Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph