Skip to content
Hendricks Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hendricks Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$268kHealth$242kEducation$103kRecreation & Sports$100kYouth Development$23kHuman Services$20kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$17,318
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cleveland Clinic Foundation$17,318
Sam Washington Sr Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Mother's Grace: $10k → 11%Boulder Crest Retreat Foundation: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
OH
PA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 52% of Hendricks Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Hendricks Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The McDermott Foundation
—
2
Johnson & Johnson Foundation United States Inc
—
3
The Jonty Foundation Joseph S Micallef
Philanthropy
4
Parker Foundation
—
5
Donaldson Foundation
—
6
The Parker Foundation
—
7
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
8
The Proctor Foundation
—
9
Doximity Foundation
Health
10
The Patterson Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Patterson Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The Grant Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Sam Washington Sr Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $252,745 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTSAM WASHINGTON SR FOUNDATION: $22,500 · PhilanthropySAM WASHINGTON SR FOUNDATIONPROMONTORY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $125,000 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONMAYO CLINIC: $75,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICPeople's Health Clicnic: $25,000 · HealthPeople's Health ClicnicNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ABILI…Hendricks Middle School: $52,563 · OtherHendricks …Cleveland Clinic Foundation: $17,318 · OtherCleveland …University of Arizona Foundation: $50,000 · EducationBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesMOTHER'S GRACE: $10,000 · Human ServicesDENVER ART MUSEUM: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$290,245Health$225,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Other$69,881Education$50,000Human Services$20,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $252,745 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAM WASHINGTON SR FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 4y, 22% of budgetPROMONTORY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOTHER'S GRACE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetJDT FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hendricks Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hendricks Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hendricks Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home