Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hendricks Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$268kHealth$242kEducation$103kRecreation & Sports$100kYouth Development$23kHuman Services$20kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$17,318
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cleveland Clinic Foundation$17,318
Sam Washington Sr Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Mother's Grace: $10k → 11%Boulder Crest Retreat Foundation: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
OH
PA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 52% of Hendricks Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Hendricks Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The McDermott Foundation
2
Johnson & Johnson Foundation United States Inc
3
The Jonty Foundation Joseph S Micallef
Philanthropy
4
Parker Foundation
5
Donaldson Foundation
6
The Parker Foundation
7
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

8
The Proctor Foundation
9
Doximity Foundation
Health
10
The Patterson Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Patterson Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The Grant Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust and the most unlike its peers is Sam Washington Sr Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $252,745 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTSAM WASHINGTON SR FOUNDATION — $22,500 · PhilanthropySAM WASHINGTON SR FOUNDATIONPROMONTORY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $125,000 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONMAYO CLINIC — $75,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICPeople's Health Clicnic — $25,000 · HealthPeople's Health ClicnicNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ABILI…Hendricks Middle School — $52,563 · OtherHendricks …Cleveland Clinic Foundation — $17,318 · OtherCleveland …University of Arizona Foundation — $50,000 · EducationBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesMOTHER'S GRACE — $10,000 · Human ServicesDENVER ART MUSEUM — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$290,245Health$225,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Other$69,881Education$50,000Human Services$20,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $252,745 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAM WASHINGTON SR FOUNDATION — $22,500 over 4y, 22% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROMONTORY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMOTHER'S GRACE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetJDT FAMILY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hendricks Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph