Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hemant Shah Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$444k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$121k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$208kHealth$197kEducation$92kPhilanthropy$12kHuman Services$3kRecreation & Sports$2kInternational$2kYouth Development$752Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $376k
$24,100
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PANDIT TODARMAL SARVODAYA TRUST$121,000
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL FOR BLIND$90,000
Individual grant recipient$90,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
JAIN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA$24,100
SHREE SATSHRUT SEVA SADHANA KENDRA$17,500
HOBOKEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$17,350
SHREE GUNALIT JYOT MAHILA TRUST$9,000
WASHINGTON COMMUNITY CHURCH$250
SHRINERS HOSPITALS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 68% of grant dollars ($498k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 32% that went abroad ($238k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UPMC CHILDRENS PGH: $100 → 11%ANOOPAM MISSION: $250 → 11%SHRINERS HOSPITAL: $100 → 22%AKSHAYA PARTRA: $200 → 10%AKSHAYA PATRA USA: $100 → 14%UNITED STATES JUDO ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 6%INDO AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZEN ASSOCI: $250 → 13%UNICEF USA: $450 → 17%JAIN ADHYATMA ACADEMY: $2k → 5%JAIN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $24k → 12%DR KIRAN AND PALLAVI PATEL FOUNDATI: $2k → 13%ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%SHRINERS HOSPITAL: $100 → 14%MARCH OF DIMEE: $100 → 4%JAIN CENTER OF NEW JERSEY: $5k → 5%SIDDHACHALAM JAIN TEMPLE: $75k → 7%BAPS: $501 → 11%ST JOSEPH CHILDREN HOSP: $100 → 12%CAREPOINT HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $175k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 16%WASHINGTON COMMUNITY CHURCH: $250 → 6%VEERAYATAN INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 8%ANOOPAM MISSION: $250 → 11%JAIN CENTER OF AMERICA: $8k → 13%UNICEF USA: $100 → 17%JAANA: $12k → 5%SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $100 → 13%ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $600 → 17%JAIN CENTER OF NEW JERSEY: $1k → 5%SIDDHACHALAM JAIN TEMPLE: $50k → 7%BAPS: $251 → 11%JAIN SAMAJ OF USA: $6k → 14%JAIN CENTER OF NEW JERSEY: $451 → 16%ANOOPAM MISSION: $201 → 11%INDO AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZEN: $3k → 13%UNICEF USA: $100 → 17%JAANA: $100 → 5%ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $100 → 17%JCNJ: $651 → 5%SIDDHACHALAM JAIN TEMPLE: $1k → 7%JAIN SAMAJ OF USA: $2k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $100 → 17%ST JOSEPH SCHOOL FOR BLIND: $90k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $100 → 17%HOBOKEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $17k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $100 → 17%SHREE SATSHRUT SEVA SAHANA: $11k → 14%SHREE GUNATIT: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 32% of all-years giving ($238k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$238k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 11 repeat orgs$577k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
21

Total granted

$159k
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+37%

Still filing today

36%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $369k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2024 · $126k
  • J
    JAANA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k
  • JS
    JAIN SAMAJ OF USA INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $8k

Funded once

  • CH
    CAREPOINT HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $175k
  • SS
    SHREE SATSHRUT SEVA SAHANA
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • JC
    JAIN CENTER OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
Ashajyothi Usa

To create an environment of hope & respect for the children with special needs and assist each child in reaching thier maximum potential through holistic interventions. we, a group of individuals who believe that it is our social(contunied…

—
4
American Academy of Pediatrics

The mission of the american academy of pediatrics is to obtain optimal physical, mental and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. the academy seeks to promote this goal by encouraging and assisting its…

Health
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
6
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
7
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Usa-World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiatric Surgery
Education
10
American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

The mission of the american academy of child and adolescent psychiatry is to promote healthy development of children, adolescents, and families through advocacy, education, and research; and to meet the professional needs of child and…

—
11
American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine

Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public. aacom represents and advances the continuum of medical education by: supporting our member institutions as they educate the…

Education
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Fund for Unicef; the most unlike its peers is United States Judo Associationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAREPOINT HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $175,000 · OtherCAREPOINT HEALTH SYSTEM INCIndividual grant recipient: $126,252 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPANDIT TODARMAL SARVODAYA TRUST: $121,000 · OtherPANDIT TODARMAL SARVODAYA TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOSEPH SCHOOL FOR BLIND: $90,000 · OtherST JOSEPH SCHOOL FOR BLIND+27 more: $126,213 · Other+27 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,600 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $228 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 · HealthUNITED STATES JUDO ASSOCIATIONINC: $2,050 · Recreation & SportsVEERAYATAN INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyANOOPAM MISSION INC: $701 · ReligionUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $650 · InternationalAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $100 · Food & NutritionTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25 · Animals
Other$728,465Health$2,928Recreation & Sports$2,050Philanthropy$1,000Religion$701International$650Food & Nutrition$100Animals$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES JUDO ASSOCIATIONINC: $2,050 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVEERAYATAN INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANOOPAM MISSION INC: $701 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $228 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES JUDO ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds VEERAYATAN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ANOOPAM MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hemant Shah Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hemant Shah Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hemant Shah Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph