Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helping Human Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$30kHuman Services$28kInternational$20kHealth$16kReligion$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,429
Median grant
5
States reached
$123k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,125
SIUT HOSPITAL NORTH AMERICA$5,500
FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL$5,500
Masjid At-Taqwa$3,429
ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOU$3,000
QURAN INSTITUE OF AMERICA$1,000
ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOU$1,000
ISLAMIC ASSOCIATE OF YPSILANTI$921
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($132k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($22k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOU: $3k → 13%MEDECINS SANS FORTIERES DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%PURE HANDS INC: $1k → 5%SIUT HOSPITAL NORTH AMERICA: $6k → 16%FRIENDS OF HUMANITY INTRANTIONAL INC: $10k → 13%ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOU: $1k → 15%MISC UNDER 1000: $6k → 14%MERCY HOSPITAL: $810 → 21%MERCY WITHOUT LIMITS: $720 → 5%FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL: $6k → 7%EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%AGHOSH AIKHIDMAR USA: $1k → 5%SIUT HOSPITAL NORTH AMERICA: $2k → 16%MASJID AT-TAQWA: $6k → 14%QURAN INSTITUE OF AMERICA: $1k → 21%FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL: $2k → 7%PURE HANDS HELP FOR YEMEN: $517 → 5%SUIT NORTH AMERICA: $1k → 16%Masjid At-Taqwa: $3k → 14%PEOPLE OF HUMANITY: $15k → 21%MASJID AT -TAQWA: $1k → 14%PEOPLE OF HMANITY: $8k → 21%Masjid At-Taqwa: $900 → 14%PEOPLE OF HUMANITY: $4k → 21%HEALTHCARE DME LLC: $270 → 14%PEOPLE OF HUMANITY: $4k → 21%ID ANN ARBOR: $10k → 14%PEOPLE OF HUMANITY: $1k → 21%ISLAMIC ASSOCIATE OF YPSILANTI: $921 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($22k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Pakistan$22k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50k · 4 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +217% since the first grant, against +147% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
17

Total granted

$50k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+217%
+147%

Still filing today

50%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2025 · $24k
  • MA
    MASJID AT-TAQWA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue +217%
  • SH
    SIUT HOSPITAL NORTH AMERICA
    2× · 2023–2025 · $8k

Funded once

  • VI
    VARIOUS IN AND OUTSIDE USA
    one grant, 2021 · $28k
  • HH
    HELPING HUMAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HUMANITY INTRANTIONAL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS IN AND OUTSIDE USA: $27,534 · OtherVARIOUS IN AND OUTSIDE USAIndividual grant recipient: $23,905 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHELPING HUMAN FOUNDATION: $22,000 · OtherHELPING HUMAN FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF HUMANITY INTRANTIONAL INC: $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF HUMANITY INTRANTIONAL INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $8,461 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSIUT HOSPITAL NORTH AMERICA: $7,500 · OtherSIUT HOSPITAL NORTH AMERICAMISC UNDER 1000: $6,018 · Other+11 more: $17,044 · Other+11 moreMASJID AT-TAQWA: $10,829 · ReligionFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 · HealthPURE HANDS INC: $1,000 · InternationalMercy Without Limits: $720 · InternationalTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $1,000 · Education
Other$132,462Religion$10,829Health$7,500International$1,720Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMASJID AT-TAQWA: $10,829 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPURE HANDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MASJID AT-TAQWA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PURE HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Without Limits ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Helping Human Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helping Human Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helping Human’s filings →

    More from the funding graph