Skip to content

Indiana · Private foundation

Helping Fund

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2023
28
Grants FY2023
27
Organizations funded FY2023
19%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$21,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$112,300
Organizations funded a year
23 to 28
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
3
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 19% of the organizations Helping Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 15% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $149k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Arts & CulturePhilanthropySocial ScienceReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202327$1.0M19%
FY202224$135k46%
FY202123$214k22%
FY202028$317kn/a
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$558kAnimals$376kEducation$203kPhilanthropy$177kHealth$115kReligion$75kCommunity Improvement$62kSocial Science$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 31 recipients with no EIN on record ($644k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Helping Fund supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $375,546 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetButler University: $169,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for the Performing Arts Inc: $121,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUnited Way of Central Indiana Inc: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana Repertory Theatre Inc: $95,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $92,700 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSt Vincent Hospital Foundation Inc: $37,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Interfaith Cooperation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNewfields Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mind Trust Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSmithsonian Institution: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Geographic Society: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana State Museum Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndianapolis Chamber Orchestra Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana Historical Society: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMental Health Association of Maryland Inc: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN25× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · The Ackerman Foundation · Dorsey Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The R B Annis Educational Foundation · White Oak Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Helping Fund with peer funders

About Helping Fund

How much does Helping Fund give?
Helping Fund reported 28 grants totaling $1,016,628 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 23 and 28 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Helping Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2023, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (33%), Animals (22%), Education (12%).
Who are Helping Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2023: Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc ($376k), Butler University ($170k), The Center for the Performing Arts Inc ($121k).
Does Helping Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 19% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Helping Fund accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Helping Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Lilly Endowment Inc, Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc, Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc.
Where is Helping Fund based?
Helping Fund is based in IN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Helping’s filings →

More from the funding graph