· Public charity
Hello in There Foundation
Organizing programs and making grants to organizations that support those who are marginalized, discriminated against, or otherwise forgotten.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $267,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $363,930 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $96,430 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $125k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $128k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRST CONTACT 211 TAMPA BAY CARES | $127,500 |
| MANNA FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| THISTLE FARMS | $15,000 |
| ELLAS HOUSE | $15,000 |
| COLABORATIVA LA MILPA | $10,000 |
| COOPERATE WNC | $10,000 |
| MUSICARES | $10,000 |
| GULFPORT SENIOR CENTER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND | $10,000 |
| ACTORS BRIDGE ENSEMBLE | $10,000 |
| TN JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS | $10,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST TN | $7,500 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NE TN | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHISTLE FARMS INC3× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue +114%
- RIROOM IN THE INN INC3× · 2021–2023 · $61k
COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $45k · revenue -6%
Funded once
- ITINCLUSION TENNESSEEone grant, 2023 · $100k
- TKTHE KEEP A BREAST FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +15%
- MOMUSICIANS ON CALL INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.
Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.
The Council on Aging of Greater Nashville d/b/a AgeWell Middle Tennessee (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to serve as a trusted resource and to advance solutions for the critical needs of older adults and…
Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.
Lead our community's efforts to house, support, empower and advocate for families experiencing homelessness.
Assist domestic violence and sexual assault programs, law enforcement, courts, community organizations and the general public: training and technical assistance.
Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…
The mission of tccn is to support, educate, and represent non-profit organizations that provide charitable healthcare services to low-income, uninsured, and underserved tennesseans. tccn envisions a strong, compassionate healthcare safety…
To reduce homelessness and improve family stability by increasing housing resources, administration of hud-mckinney vento funds, and support services through collaborative efforts with partner organizations, when available.
Mental health cooperative inc. (mhc) provides integrated health services that include behavioral health care, primary health care, addiction services, and community-based care management. mhc also provides emergency psychiatric services…
Providing services to clients to assist in preventing homelessness, training partner organizations on reporting system and reporting to governments, statistical information.
Provide needy families and individuals with rent and utilities assistance in order to prevent their eviction or termination of utility services. also provide food and other assistance to needy families and individuals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Raphah Institute and the most unlike its peers is The Mosaic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 211 Tampa Bay Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE KEEP A BREAST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSICIANS ON CALL INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds PORTERS CALL ↗
- Who funds The Mosaic Institute ↗
- Who funds RENEWAL HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COALITION FOR HOMELESS VETERANS ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds RAPHAH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CONEXION AMERICAS ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds A STEP AHEAD FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds Ellas House ↗
- Who funds COUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE GULFPORT MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL VERMONT COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds SPORTS CREATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CO-OPERATE WNC ↗
- Who funds CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND ↗
- Who funds MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Colaborativa La Milpa ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SHARES INC ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS ↗
- Who funds HEALING HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds ACTORS BRIDGE ENSEMBLE THEATER OF NASHVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TN ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Vanderbilt University · The Frist Foundation · Joe C Davis Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · The Dan and Margaret Maddox Fund Inc · Nashville Predators Foundation · Gibson Gives Foundation Dba Gibson Gives
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hello in There Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Capstone Community Action Inc — 84% of income from government
- Central Vermont Council On Aging Inc — 74% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hello in There Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hello in There Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.