Skip to content

· Private foundation

Helen & Jack McCullough Family Fndn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$363kHuman Services$99kFood & Nutrition$94kInternational$48kPhilanthropy$19kHealth$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lick-Wilmerding High School$29,000
Special Operations Warrior Foundation$11,000
Individual grant recipient$11,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$11,000
Fisher House Foundation$9,000
Freedom Alliance$6,000
Warrior Foundation Freedom Station$3,000
William Jessup University$3,000
Tunnels to Towers Foundation$2,500
Troop Direct$2,000
Salvation Army$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Project independence$1,000
KCOLF Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $2k → 10%Warrior Foundation Freedom Station: $3k → 11%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 10%Warrior Foundation Freedom Station: $3k → 11%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 10%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $3k → 11%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 10%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $3k → 11%Project independence: $1k → 10%Project independence: $1k → 10%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 10%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 10%PROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$754k · 15 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
0

Total granted

$754k
$0

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ARTS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $236k · revenue +10%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +265%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +32%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Troops First Foundation Incorporated

    To develop, operate, and support a synergistic group of wellness, quality of life, and event-based initiatives in support of today's combat-wounded military personnel and their families, while facilitating a greater recognition and…

    Public Benefit
    2
    Special Forces Foundation

    The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

    Philanthropy
    3
    Fielding Graduate University

    We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

    —
    4
    Shield of Faith Missions

    Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

    Religion
    5
    Special Operators Transition Foundation Inc

    The special operators transition foundation ("sotf") assists special operation forces veterans transition from the military into their next successful career.

    Public Benefit
    6
    Sentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation

    Sentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation (the Foundation) is a Colorado notprofit organization formed in 2007 for the purpose of assisting veterans who have suffered severe duty-related injuries resulting in permanent physical…

    Education
    7
    It's About the Warriors Foundation

    To assist and empower all post 9/11 veterans and their families from the tri-state area, regardless if they have been wounded or have been deployed, with our various programs thus, leading them to a successful and enriched life.

    Public Benefit
    8
    Semper Fi & America's Fund

    The fund cares for our nation's critically wounded, ill, and injured service members, veterans and military families. we assist all military branches, including both post-9/11 and vietnam veterans, providing one-on-one case management,…

    Health
    9
    The Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund

    The intrepid fallen heroes fund serves military personnel suffering traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress, and other severe injuries.the intrepid fallen heroes fund serves military personnel suffering traumatic brain injury,…

    Philanthropy
    10
    NextOp Inc

    NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

    Public Benefit
    11
    Fdd Action

    FDD Action is a non-profit, non-partisan 504(c)4 organization established to advocate for effective policies to promote U.S. National Security and defend free nations.

    Community Improvement
    12
    United States Naval Institute

    Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Operations Warrior Foundation; the most unlike its peers is William Jessup University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ARTS: $236,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ARTSSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $95,500 · EducationSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION+1 more: $9,500 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $93,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $93,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $68,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY: $22,000 · OtherWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITYUSO: $20,500 · OtherUSO+3 more: $26,500 · Other+3 moreFREEDOM ALLIANCE: $48,000 · InternationalWARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $11,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $9,500 · Human ServicesTroops Direct: $19,000 · Philanthropy
    Education$341,000Other$324,500International$48,000Human Services$21,000Philanthropy$19,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ARTS: $236,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $95,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $68,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE: $48,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY: $22,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTroops Direct: $19,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT INDEPENDENCE: $9,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ARTS ↗
    • Who funds SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE ↗
    • Who funds WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds Troops Direct ↗
    • Who funds WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION ↗
    • Who funds PROJECT INDEPENDENCE ↗
    • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Helen & Jack McCullough Family Fndn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Helen & Jack McCullough Family Fndn. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      1get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Helen & Jack McCullough Family Fndn?

      Find your warmest path to Helen & Jack McCullough Family Fndn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Helen & Jack McCullough Family Fndn’s filings →

      More from the funding graph