Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hej Field Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$578k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$404kEducation$386kEnvironment$200kPublic Benefit$107kHealth$30kYouth Development$20kCivil Rights$20kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $500k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$536k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY$200,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$200,000
MINNESOTA LAND TRUST$100,000
LGBTQ CENTER OF THE DESERT$20,000
PROJECT SUCCESS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
WASHBURN CENTER FOR CHILDREN$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$5,000
STOCKHOLM INSTITUTE$1,604
PEPIN FOOD PANTRY$1,000
BELLE PLAINE IA FOOD PANTRY$125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%STOCKHOLM COMMUNITY: $314 → 5%INTERNATIONAL OWL CENTER: $500 → 8%CITY OF LAKE CITY: $7k → 8%CITY OF RED WING: $100k → 9%NORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL: $500 → 9%IMMANUAL LUTHERAN FOOD SHELF: $1k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $200k → 11%MN CONSERVATION VOLUNTEER: $500 → 14%LGBTQ CENTER OF THE DESERT: $20k → 11%TRACY FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 12%CANCER LEGAL CENTER: $3k → 14%LAKE CITY PICKLEBALL: $15k → 19%BELLE PLAINE IA FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 8%LUND FIRE DEPARTMENT: $50k → 9%BUFFALO HANOVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $185k → 5%RED WING YMCA: $10k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10k → 11%MINNESOTA LAND TRUST: $100k → 14%BELLE PLAINE IA FOOD PANTRY: $125 → 8%VILLAGE OF STOCKHOLM: $638 → 9%RED WING YMCA: $10k → 9%WASHBURN CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 11%MINNESOTA LAND TRUST: $100k → 14%PEPIN FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%WASHBURN CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 11%ST PAUL URBAN TENNIS: $500 → 14%VILLAGE OF STOCKHOLM: $53 → 9%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $200k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 14%PEPIN FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $200k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 14%STOCKHOLM INSTITUTE: $2k → 11%STOCKHOLM INSTITUTE: $500 → 11%PROJECT SUCCESS: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$655k · 9 repeat orgs$613k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$655k
$363k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

44%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentHealthCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    MINNESOTA LAND TRUST
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue +27%
  • WC
    Washburn Center for Children
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • BH
    BUFFALO HANOVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2024 · $185k
  • CO
    CITY OF RED WING
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Great Northern Winter Festival

The great northern celebrates our cold, creative winters through ten days of diverse programming that invigorate mind and body. in an era of changing climate that threatens our signature season, we seek to create community, inspire action,…

Arts & Culture
2
Thomas Irvine Dodge Nature Center

Dodge nature center and preschool mission is providing exceptional experiences in nature through environmental education. we envision a future where everyone inspired by dodge intentionally cares for nature.

—
3
Park Square Theatre

To enrich the community by producing and presenting exceptional live theatre that touches the heart, engages the mind and delights the spirit.

—
4
Twin Cities Public Television Inc

The mission of twin cities public television, inc. (tpt) is to enrich lives and strengthen our community through the power of media.see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
5
Northland College

Northland college's mission is to integrate undergraduate liberal arts studies with an environmental emphasis, enabling those it serves to address the challenges of the future.

Education
6
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
7
Ely Folk School

Building community by providing learning experiences that celebrate the wilderness heritage art history culture and craft of the people of northern Minnesota.

Arts & Culture
8
Achieve Twin Cities

As one of the upper midwest's leading career and college readiness organizations, achieve twin cities rallies community support and delivers best-in-class programs to inspire and equip young people in minneapolis and saint paul, minnesota…

Youth Development
9
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
10
Sustainable Farming Association of Minnesota

Support the development and enhancement of sustainable farming systems through farmer-to-farmer networking, innovation, demonstration, and education.

Food & Nutrition
11
Owl's Hill Nature Sanctuary

Mission/work: to provide a protected sanctuary for native wildlife and their habitats while connecting people with nature in ways that inspire exploration and lifelong environmental conservation.

Animals
12
Environmental Initiative

Catalyze collaboration across perspectives, power, and systems for social equity and environmental health.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Hennepin County Library; the most unlike its peers is Minnesota Land Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $200,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARYBUFFALO HANOVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $185,000 · OtherBUFFALO HANOVER PUBLIC SCHOOLSCITY OF RED WING: $100,000 · OtherCITY OF RED WINGIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+15 more: $82,775 · Other+15 moreSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $400,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLANDMINNESOTA LAND TRUST: $200,000 · EnvironmentMINNESOTA LAND TR…PROJECT SUCCESS: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationWashburn Center for Children: $20,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementINTERNATIONAL OWL CENTER: $500 · Animals
Other$617,775Food & Nutrition$400,000Environment$200,000Education$20,500Health$20,000Community Improvement$10,000Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $400,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA LAND TRUST: $200,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $200,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWashburn Center for Children: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SUCCESS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL OWL CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Washburn Center for Children ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL OWL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hej Field Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hej Field Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hej Field’s filings →

    More from the funding graph