Skip to content

· Private foundation

Heinrich Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of Heinrich Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Cauze Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’23
1
’24
5
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$115kHuman Services$80kEducation$69kPhilanthropy$50kRecreation & Sports$15kAnimals$13kHealth$8kYouth Development$3k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $123k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAUZE CHARITABLE FUND$25,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$25,000
YMCA OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$20,000
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION$15,000
SOCIAL GOOD FUND$15,000
THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION$12,500
GLAMOUR PROJECT$10,000
WARRIOR RISING$5,000
MARINE CORPS LEAGUE-TOYS FOR TOTS$2,500
CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $40k → 13%YMCA OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20k → 13%YMCA OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unlv Research Foundation

The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the purposes of supporting, promoting, and reporting research activities at the university of nevada, las vegas, as an entity of the board of regents of the nevada system of…

Science & Tech
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
Mgm Resorts Foundation

The mgm resorts foundation brings the best of our employee volunteer and charitable efforts together with greater impact and greater choice. the mgm resorts foundation focuses employee charitable contributions to non-profit agencies and…

Philanthropy
5
Nevada Community Foundation Inc

Our mission is to steward our donors' charitable giving, now and for generations to come and to provide leadership, vision and impactful community investment for southern nevada.

Philanthropy
6
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
7
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
8
Mayor's Fund for Las Vegas Life

To advance the quality of life for residents of the city of las vegas by bringing together private-public partnerships to address the city's most pressing needs through collaborative and transformational problem solving.

Public Benefit
9
The Greater Las Vegas Chamber of Commerc

To strengthen, enhance, and protect business in Nevada.

—
10
Ufw Foundation

The ufw foundation's mission is to empower communities to ensure human dignity.

—
11
Nevada Women's Fund

Nevada women's fund's mission is to empower women through education and career advancement opportunities, ultimately strengthening our community by ensuring that women face no barriers to achievement.

—
12
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of Southern Nevada; the most unlike its peers is Warrior Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Las Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation: $115,000 · Crime & LegalLas Vegas Metropolitan PD FoundationUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS…UCLA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $15,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INCYMCA OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $70,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF SOUTHERN NEVAD…UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOOTBALL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY …GLAMOUR PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherGLAMOUR PRO…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LAS ANGELES FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY …MARINE CORPS LEAGUE-TOYS FOR TOTS: $2,500 · OtherMARINE CORP…CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,500 · OtherCAUZE CHARITABLE FUND: $25,000 · Public BenefitTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $12,500 · AnimalsWarrior Rising: $10,000 · PhilanthropySAM SCHMIDT FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Health
Crime & Legal$115,000Education$75,000Human Services$70,000Other$36,500Public Benefit$25,000Animals$12,500Philanthropy$10,000Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLas Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation: $115,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetYMCA OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $70,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWarrior Rising: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAM SCHMIDT FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heinrich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heinrich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Heinrich Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Heinrich Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heinrich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph