Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hebson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$412k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.1MInternational$256kEducation$30k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $282k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$40,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NEXT STEP FUND INC$80,000
ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION$50,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED$41,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED$41,000
AIDS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM$40,000
THE MAGIC YARN PROJECT$40,000
ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC$40,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$40,000
ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $309k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 11%THE NEXT STEP FUND INC: $80k → 8%THE NEXT STEP FUND INC: $40k → 8%THE NEXT STEP FUND INC: $40k → 8%THE NEXT STEP FUND INC: $40k → 8%THE NEXT STEP FUND INC: $38k → 8%THE NEXT STEP FUND INC: $38k → 8%THE NEXT STEP FUND INC: $30k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
AZ
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Hebson Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Hebson Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 7 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$1.7M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+116%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $305k · revenue +231%
  • TN
    THE NEXT STEP FUND INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $305k · revenue +56%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $265k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • AIDS UNITED
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -30%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SENTEBALE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -30%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +162%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Foundation for Aids Research

Amfar is dedicated to ending the global aids epidemic through innovative research. (see schedule o)

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
4
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
5
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities Inc

American lebanese syrian associated charities, inc. (alsac) was founded in 1957 and exists solely to raise funds and build awareness to sustain and grow the mission of st. jude children's research hospital, inc. to advance cures, and means…

Religion
6
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
International Cancer Advocacy Network

Ican's mission is two-fold: to optimize stage iv cancer patient survival and work to attain the highest possible quality of life. ican assists stage iv cancer patients with 1) direct patient navigation and customized advocacy services; 2)…

Philanthropy
10
The Jed Ian Taxel Foundation for Rare Cancer Research Inc

To inspire and empower scientific breakthroughs, clinical trials and improved treatments which change lives and enable better outcomes for rare cancer patients and their families.

Health
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Magic Yarn Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $305,000 · HealthELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $265,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCAIDS Assistance Program: $185,000 · HealthAIDS Assistance ProgramThe Magic Yarn Project: $135,000 · HealthThe Magic Yarn Project+1 more: $10,000 · HealthCompassion International Incorporated: $309,000 · InternationalCompassion Internatio…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SENTEBALE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF S…THE NEXT STEP FUND INC: $305,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEXT STEP FUND …+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $225,000 · OtherALEXS LEMONADE…AIDS UNITED: $30,000 · Education
Health$900,000International$334,000Human Services$309,000Other$225,000Education$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $309,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $305,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NEXT STEP FUND INC: $305,000 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $265,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAIDS Assistance Program: $185,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetThe Magic Yarn Project: $135,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetAIDS UNITED: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SENTEBALE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hebson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hebson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • The Next Step Fund Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hebson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hebson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hebson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph