Skip to content
Hearts That Care Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hearts That Care Inc

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$34kRecreation & Sports$7kHealth$5kHuman Services$3kYouth Development$830Animals$385Crime & Legal$300Food & Nutrition$130Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$88k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$510
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $100 → 11%PLACER AQUATIC CLUB: $250 → 6%DONORSCHOOSEORG: $100 → 17%ANGELEYES FOUNDATION: $200 → 16%LIGHT OF HOPE: $100 → 10%OMEGA UPLIFT FOUNDATION: $150 → 17%DESTINATION IMIGRATION: $500 → 14%RISING STARS ATHLETICS: $500 → 11%SANDY HOOK PROMISE: $100 → 9%AMITY REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 5: $1k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%ALAN J HARRISON SCHOLARSHIP: $500 → 9%ANGEL EYES: $100 → 12%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $5k → 8%METAVIVOR RESEARCH: $100 → 6%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $100 → 11%SOUTHERN ARIZONA ARTS & CULTURAL ALLIANCE: $125 → 15%NATIONAL GEOGRAHIC FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE: $100 → 14%RISING STARS ATHLETICS: $250 → 11%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%ANGELS OF AMERICANS FALLEN: $200 → 9%FIRST TEE: $150 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $3k → 8%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $100 → 11%RISING STARS ATHLETICS: $250 → 11%ST JUDES: $160 → 17%ALPINE AUTISM CENTER: $250 → 9%VIRGINIA ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEG: $8k → 11%AMITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $500 → 15%RISING STARS ATHLETICS: $250 → 11%ALPINE AUTISM CENTER: $250 → 9%VIRGINIA ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 11%AMITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $500 → 15%ANGLE EYES: $230 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $2k → 8%GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEG: $1k → 11%AMITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $500 → 15%STEELE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $550 → 12%VIRGINIA ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%AMITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $500 → 15%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $2k → 8%AMITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $500 → 15%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $500 → 9%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $500 → 9%CHEYENNE MTN ZOO: $510 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36k · 12 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +62% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
27

Total granted

$36k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+62%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +78%
  • RS
    RISING STARS ATHLETICS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +220%
  • AA
    ALPINE AUTISM CENTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $750 · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • GC
    glendale community college
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • BF
    BEN FRANKLIN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • AR
    AMITY REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 5
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
National Autism Center Inc

Amid the proliferation of advice about treatment options for autism, the ability to access accurate information about research-validated approaches is critically important to those seeking effective treatment.

Health
3
Phoenix Children's Hospital

To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.

Health
4
Coras Angels

Our mission is to advance research on physical, speech, behavioral and other alternative therapies for angelman syndrome.

Education
5
Childsafe Colorado Inc

Mission: our mission is to break the cycle and heal the childhood trauma resulting from abuse and neglect with specialized treatment, education and community outreach. we believe in a comprehensive, community-based approach to the problem…

Crime & Legal
6
Delta Gamma Anchor Center for Blind Children

Part i and part iii, line 1: anchor center for blind children is a nationally recognized leader in teaching children with vision, cortical visual, dual sensory (vision and hearing), and co-occurring disabilities during their most formative…

—
7
Autism Service Center of San Antonio Dba Autism Community Network

THE MISSION OF THE CENTER IS TO MAXIMIZE THE POTENTIAL OF CHILDREN WITHAUTISM BY PROVIDING EARLY DIAGNOSIS FOR THOSE WITH LIMITED ACCESS ANDEDUCATING AND EMPOWERING THE COMMUNITY TO SUPPORT THEM. The primary goals of ACN are to provide…

—
8
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
9
Sonoran Desert Aquatics

To provide aquatics programming for all ages and levels of swimmers.

Recreation & Sports
10
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
11
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
12
Angels At Risk

As a community, the issue of drug and alcohol use and abuse in kids, teenagers and families is an epidemic crisis. we know that early education, prevention, and intervention can change families' futures forever. our mission is to raise…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Angels of America's Fallen; the most unlike its peers is Angel Eyes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $10,525 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVIRGINIA ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $4,970 · OtherVIRGINIA ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONglendale community college: $4,000 · Otherglendale community collegeIndiana University School of Medicine: $3,000 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineAMITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $2,000 · Other+24 more: $7,830 · Other+24 moreBEN FRANKLIN FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · EducationBEN FRANK…+1 more: $100 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,260 · Health+2 more: $150 · HealthRISING STARS ATHLETICS INC: $1,250 · Recreation & SportsPLACER AQUATICS CLUB INC: $250 · Recreation & SportsANGELS OF AMERICA'S FALLEN: $200 · Crime & LegalSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $100 · Crime & LegalArt State Arizona: $125 · PhilanthropyYOUNG LIFE: $100 · Youth Development
Other$40,825Education$4,100Health$3,410Recreation & Sports$1,500Crime & Legal$300Philanthropy$125Youth Development$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,260 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRISING STARS ATHLETICS INC: $1,250 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetALPINE AUTISM CENTER: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLACER AQUATICS CLUB INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANGELS OF AMERICA'S FALLEN: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAngel Eyes: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetArt State Arizona: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT OF HOPE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Community Services: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds RISING STARS ATHLETICS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALPINE AUTISM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PLACER AQUATICS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS OF AMERICA'S FALLEN ↗
  • Who funds Angel Eyes ↗
  • Who funds Art State Arizona ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hearts That Care Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hearts That Care Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hearts That Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home