Skip to content

· Private foundation

Healthcare Foundation of Miami County Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$441kHealth$434kEducation$420kRecreation & Sports$253kCrime & Legal$170kArts & Culture$53kPhilanthropy$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $209k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.8M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI COUNTY YMCA$1,805,427
IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC$55,850
Individual grant recipient$53,006
HARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC$50,000
HARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC$50,000
IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC$30,000
DENVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$19,488
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$15,000
MIAMI COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT$12,000
MIAMI COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT$10,000
MACONAQUAH SCHOOL CORP$9,929
MIAMI COUNTY YMCA$9,585
AMBOY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$8,857
MIAMI COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$8,150
Individual grant recipient$6,150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $15k → 13%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 13%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 13%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 13%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3k → 13%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $1.8M → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $380k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $324k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $302k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $289k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $200k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $200k → 14%HARVESTING CAPABILITIES: $60k → 14%HARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC: $50k → 14%HARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC: $50k → 14%HARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC: $25k → 14%HARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC: $23k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $12k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $12k → 14%HARVESTING CAPABILITIES: $10k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $10k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $10k → 14%HARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC: $6k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS INC: $6k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS INC: $6k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS: $6k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS INC: $6k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS: $6k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS: $6k → 14%HARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC: $5k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS: $5k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS: $5k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $4k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $3k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $3k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $3k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $3k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $2k → 14%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 24 repeat orgs$526k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +66% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
15

Total granted

$5.2M
$458k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+66%

Still filing today

33%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIAMI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +157%
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $326k · revenue +208%
  • NP
    NICKEL PLATE TRAIL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • SC
    ST CHARLES CONFERENCE OF ST VINCENT
    one grant, 2024 · $200k
  • CR
    COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • CC
    CIRCUS CITY FESTIVAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $53k · revenue +66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miami Township Volunteer Fire Dept

The organization protects the community during fires, traffic accidents, and medical emergencies in miami and part of tipton twp in cass co indiana.

—
2
United Way Miami Inc

The mission of united way miami is to build the community by helping people care for one another. united way brings people and institutions together to improve the education, financial stability and health of our community and its…

Philanthropy
3
Volunteer Action Center of Miami Inc Hands On Miami

Hands on miami inspires, equips and mobilizes people to take action to positively affect change in miami-dade county.

—
4
Miami Dade Community Services Inc
Human Services
5
Miami County Visitors & Convention Bureau Inc

Attract, promote, and advance travel & tourism's positive impact on miami county.

—
6
Society of St Vincent De Paul Inc

Dispense clothing, payment vouchers for food, shelter, medical, transportation on a non-sectarian basis to any resident of miami county where there is a need.

—
7
Little Miami Food Services Inc

Feed the hungry

Human Services
8
Miami Valley Community Action Partnership

The mission of miami valley community action partnership is to work in partnership with local communities to eliminate the causes and conditions of poverty and to promote individual independence and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
9
The Miami-Dade Beacon Council Inc

Increasing jobs and investment in miami-dade county.

—
10
Miami International Festival Inc
—
11
University of Miami
—
12
Greater Miami Service Corps

Developing and administering a volunteer service program consisting principally of youth volunteers, which benefit the community by providing this needed public service. the program also develops employment opportunities for the youth.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Indiana Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Amboy Volunteer Fire Co Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIAMI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $3,562,585 · Human ServicesMIAMI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INCHARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC: $228,500 · Human ServicesHARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC+2 more: $83,578 · Human ServicesST CHARLES CONFERENCE OF ST VINCENT: $200,000 · OtherST CHARLES CONFERENCE OF…AMBOY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $132,004 · OtherAMBOY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEP…DENVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $94,400 · OtherDENVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DE…MIAMI COUNTY PROBATION DEPT: $87,200 · OtherMIAMI COUNTY PROBATION D…MIAMI COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH: $85,369 · OtherMIAMI COUNTY BOARD OF HE…MIAMI COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: $78,300 · OtherMIAMI COUNTY SHERIFF'S D…COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $60,000 · OtherPIPE CREEK TWP VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $58,503 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $53,006 · Other+26 more: $374,381 · Other+26 moreIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $325,850 · EducationNICKEL PLATE TRAIL INC: $250,000 · Recreation & SportsCIRCUS CITY FESTIVAL INC: $52,898 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,867 · PhilanthropyFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $6,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$3,874,663Other$1,223,163Education$325,850Recreation & Sports$250,000Arts & Culture$52,898Philanthropy$13,867Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIAMI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $3,562,585 over 9y, 9.2% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $325,850 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNICKEL PLATE TRAIL INC: $250,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetHARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC: $228,500 over 6y, 44% of budgetCIRCUS CITY FESTIVAL INC: $52,898 over 1y, 23% of budgetMIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS INC: $45,578 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $38,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,867 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY INC: $9,955 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONA VISTA PROGRAMS INC: $4,689 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMBOY VOLUNTEER FIRE CO INC: $1,240 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIAMI COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NICKEL PLATE TRAIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTING CAPABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CIRCUS CITY FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI COUNTY HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BONA VISTA PROGRAMS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northern Indiana Community Foundation IncIN22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northern Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Healthcare Foundation of Miami County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Healthcare Foundation of Miami County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Healthcare Foundation of Miami County Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Healthcare Foundation of Miami County Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Healthcare Foundation of Miami County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph