Skip to content
Health Foundation of Greater Massillon at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Health Foundation of Greater Massillon

The foundation operates exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the function of, and to carry out the purpose of stark community foundation.

$350k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$1.2MHuman Services$209kEducation$110kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kArts & Culture$21kHousing & Shelter$18kCrime & Legal$15kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $290,711, the rows itemized in this filing. The $350,326 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $59,615 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $159k
$12,440
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$109,050
BEACON CHARITABLE PHARMACY$50,000
ACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY$30,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$20,000
AHEAD INC$15,000
MALONE UNIVERSITY$12,440
EMBRACING FUTURES INC$12,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF HEARTLAND STARK AND MUSKINGUM LAKES$11,700
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE$10,521
A WHOLE COMMUNITY INC$10,000
ARTSINSTARK$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $420k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF CENTRAL STARK COUNTY: $23k → 13%VANTAGE AGING: $5k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $315k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $12k → 13%SERVING AREA MILITARY AND VETERANS: $25k → 13%FAITH IN ACTION OF WESTERN STARK COUNTY: $7k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF HEARTLAND STARK AND MUSKINGUM LAKES: $12k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF HEARTLAND STARK AND MUSKINGUM LAKES: $12k → 13%STARK HOUSING NETWORK: $5k → 13%GREATER STARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC: $3k → 13%COMPASSION DELIVERED: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 18 repeat orgs$362k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
24

Total granted

$1.3M
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+53%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Beacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc
    3× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +43%
  • AH
    ACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $138k · revenue +59%
  • DV
    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SA
    SERVING AREA MILITARY VETERANS & WIDOWSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +91%
  • YO
    YMCA of Central Stark County
    one grant, 2021 · $23k · revenue +18%
  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC MERCY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Greater Stark County

We build our community's capacity to alleviate the impact of poverty and empower families to unleash their potential.

Philanthropy
2
Stark County Council On Aging

Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes

Human Services
3
Stark Community Support Network

To improve family quality of life

Human Services
4
Stark Economic Development Board Inc

We strengthen stark county by driving business growth and leading its economic transformation.

Community Improvement
5
Akron Community Foundation

To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…

Philanthropy
6
Stark County District Library Foundation

Support of the Stark County District Library

Education
7
Homeless Outreach Team of Stark Cou

Assist the homeless to rise out of poverty

Housing & Shelter
8
Community Building Partnership of Stark County Inc

To promote the revitalization of neighborhoods in stark county by leading partnership-based, neighborhood-specific, revitalization efforts and developing programs that support community reinvestment.

Community Improvement
9
Stark County District Library

Stark County District Library is an award winning library that consists of Main Library, nine branch libraries and five (5) mobile units that serve over 189,000 cardholders. The Library provides programs and classes for adults, teens and…

Education
10
Akron Aids Collaborative

The organization's primary purpose is to broaden the network of caring organizations in the community, to influence social norms that contribute to the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS and to increase advocacy for social services for…

Human Services
11
OhioHealth Corporation Group Return

To improve the health of those we serve.

Health
12
Sterling Area Health Center

Combining leadership and teamwork to provide caring, high quality, efficient, and affordable primary health care for all segments of the community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Health Stark County Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Whole Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HEALTH FOUNDATION OF GREATER MASSILLON CHARITABLE FUND: $323,520 · OtherTHE HEALTH FOUNDATION OF GREATER MASSIL…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC: $74,800 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INCYoung Mens Christian Association of Massillon YMCA Of Western Stark County: $57,500 · OtherYoung Mens Christian Association of Mas…AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $37,000 · OtherAULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION+14 more: $78,930 · Other+14 moreBeacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $140,000 · HealthBeacon Charitable Pharmacy IncACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INC: $138,493 · HealthACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INCAULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $109,050 · HealthAULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATIONEMBRACING FUTURES INC: $35,718 · HealthEMBRACING FUTURES INCTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthCLEVELAND CLINIC MERCY HOSPITAL: $20,000 · Health+4 more: $41,953 · Health+4 moreCOMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $327,302 · Human ServicesCOMMQUEST SERVICES INCAhead Inc: $54,800 · Human ServicesAhead IncSERVING AREA MILITARY VETERANS & WIDOWS: $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $23,400 · Human ServicesYMCA of Central Stark County: $23,200 · Human Services+6 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesSTARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $22,500 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITY: $12,440 · EducationKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationWalsh University Inc: $10,000 · EducationTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK: $4,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID SERVICES: $15,000 · Crime & LegalHammer & Nails Inc: $13,288 · Housing & ShelterCAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentGirls on the Run of Stark County: $5,510 · Youth Development
Other$571,750Health$505,214Human Services$478,702Education$58,940Crime & Legal$15,000Housing & Shelter$13,288Youth Development$13,010

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $327,302 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBeacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $140,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetACCESS HEALTH STARK COUNTY INC: $138,493 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetAULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $109,050 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC: $74,800 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Massillon YMCA Of Western Stark County: $57,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAhead Inc: $54,800 over 4y, 11% of budgetEMBRACING FUTURES INC: $35,718 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetSERVING AREA MILITARY VETERANS & WIDOWS: $25,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $23,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA of Central Stark County: $23,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhioGuidestone: $15,463 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHammer & Nails Inc: $13,288 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $12,440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA WHOLE COMMUNITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION OF WESTERN STARK COUNTY INC: $6,500 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetGirls on the Run of Stark County: $5,510 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OF AKRON: $5,490 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANTAGE AGING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARK HOUSING NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK: $4,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetStark County Diaper Bank Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetGREATER STARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetStark County Hunger Task Force Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCompassion Delivered Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSTARKFRESH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community Found…Sisters of Charity Fo…Austin-Bailey Health …Hoover Foundation Inc…United Way of Greater…Timken Foundation of …William & Minnette Go…North Canton Medical …Albert W & Edith V Fl…Christ FoundationMassillon Rotary Foun…Dominion Energy Chari…
Stark Community FoundationOH66.9× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · United Way of Greater Stark County · Timken Foundation of Canton · William & Minnette Goldsmith Foundation · North Canton Medical Foundation · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · Christ Foundation · Massillon Rotary Foundation Trust · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Health Foundation of Greater Massillon funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Health Foundation of Greater Massillon. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Health Foundation of Greater Massillon?

    Find your warmest path to Health Foundation of Greater Massillon through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Health Foundation of Greater Massillon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home