Skip to content
Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce at a glance

· Public charity

Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce

The HEALDSBURG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE provides services and support to and for over 500 business members to promote and ensure a viable and desirable community in which to live and work.

$303k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$379kPublic Benefit$226kHuman Services$153kCommunity Improvement$38kHousing & Shelter$20kCivil Rights$12kFood & Nutrition$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $276,800, the rows itemized in this filing. The $303,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $166k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
$20,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALEXANDER VALLEY FILM SOCIETY$103,000
CITY OF HEALDSBURG$41,800
HEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL$29,500
SD MEDIA PRODUCTIONS LLC$24,500
ROTARY CLUB OF HEALDSBURG$20,500
Individual grant recipient$15,000
THE 222$13,000
AMERICAN LEGION$12,000
WINEGROWERS OF DRY CREEK$10,000
CORAZON HEALDSBURG$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTH SONOMA COUNTY SERVICES: $20k → 9%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $20k → 9%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $15k → 9%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $13k → 9%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $12k → 9%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$793k · 13 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$793k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+283%

Still filing today

54%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    TRUE WEST FILM CENTER
    2× · 2018–2023 · $111k · revenue +693%
  • HJ
    HEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $97k · revenue +102%
  • SH
    SCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG
    5× · 2018–2023 · $67k · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • RF
    REACH FOR HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +32%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SR
    SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB OF HEALDSBURG FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +283%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Hand Fan Museum of Healdsburg
Philanthropy
2
Hermann Memorial Art Museum
—
3
Healdsburg Futbol Club Association
Recreation & Sports
4
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
5
Cal Center Presents

Arts presenter serving the greater Reedsburg area.

Arts & Culture
6
Humboldt County Historical Association
—
7
Sonoma Valley Film Festival

Sonoma valley film society produces the annual international film festival

Arts & Culture
8
Helicon Arts Cooperative
Arts & Culture
9
Rotary Club of Healdsburg - Sunrise
—
10
Tehama County Arts Council

The Tehama County Arts Council is committed to serving the community by cultivating an appreciation for the arts, providing artistic opportunities and events, and sponsoring and supporting local artists and artistic endeavors in Tehama…

—
11
Hemet Concert Association

bring world class music to SJ Valley

Arts & Culture
12
The Sea Ranch Thespians
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healdsburg Center for the Arts; the most unlike its peers is Healdsburg Museum and Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HEALDSBURG: $144,300 · OtherCITY OF HEALDSBURGRotary Club of Healdsburg: $98,500 · OtherRotary Club of HealdsburgAMERICAN LEGION: $47,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGIONTHE 222: $38,000 · OtherTHE 222CITY OF HEALDSBURG COMM SVCS: $35,000 · OtherCITY OF HEALDSBURG COMM SVCSSD MEDIA PRODUCTIONS LLC: $34,500 · OtherSD MEDIA PRODUCTIONS LLCIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHealdsburg Museum and Historical Society: $27,500 · OtherHealdsburg Museum and Historical Society+3 more: $35,000 · Other+3 moreTRUE WEST FILM CENTER: $110,500 · Arts & CultureTRUE WEST FILM CENTERHEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC: $97,000 · Arts & CultureHEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INCHEALDSBURG CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $35,000 · Arts & CultureHEALDSBURG CENTER FOR THE ARTSHEALDSBURG PERFORMING ARTS THEATER: $30,000 · Arts & CultureHEALDSBURG PERFORMING ARTS THEATERSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $66,500 · Human ServicesSCOPA HAS A…REACH FOR HOME: $20,000 · Human ServicesREACH FOR H…SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB OF HEALDSBURG FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Philanthropy
Other$488,800Arts & Culture$272,500Human Services$86,500Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUE WEST FILM CENTER: $110,500 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetRotary Club of Healdsburg: $98,500 over 4y, 41% of budgetHEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC: $97,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $66,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetHEALDSBURG CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $35,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetHEALDSBURG PERFORMING ARTS THEATER: $30,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetHealdsburg Museum and Historical Society: $27,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetREACH FOR HOME: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSUNRISE ROTARY CLUB OF HEALDSBURG FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 8.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUE WEST FILM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Healdsburg ↗
  • Who funds HEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG ↗
  • Who funds HEALDSBURG CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HEALDSBURG PERFORMING ARTS THEATER ↗
  • Who funds Healdsburg Museum and Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds REACH FOR HOME ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB OF HEALDSBURG FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Communi…Sonoma County Vintner…Anthony Crabb and Bar…The Fred and June Mac…The San Francisco Fou…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Sonoma County Community FoundationCA23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · Anthony Crabb and Barbara Grasseschi Foundation · The Fred and June Macmurray Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home