Skip to content
Hd Perry Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hd Perry Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$159kInternational$137kHuman Services$125kHealth$88kCivil Rights$82kEnvironment$77kArts & Culture$56kEmployment$39kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$3,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$12,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$12,000
MIKE ROWE WORKS FOUNDATION$12,000
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION$12,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$8,528
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$7,000
KEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES$6,500
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY$6,028
ARTSERVE INC$6,000
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC$5,000
WATER ORG INC$5,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY INC$4,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$4,000
KIWANIS CLUB OF DAVIE AND WEST HOLLYWOOD$3,500
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES: $8k → 13%KEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES: $7k → 13%KEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES: $7k → 13%KEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES: $5k → 13%KEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES: $3k → 13%KEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL: $3k → 13%KEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
CT
CA
MO
MD
KS
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$839k · 31 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
3

Total granted

$839k
$6k

Still filing today

81%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $99k · revenue +312%
  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $88k · revenue +41%
  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $87k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • OC
    OCEAN CLEANUP NORTH PACIFIC FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • FK
    FLOIDA KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
6
The Everglades Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to restore and protect america's everglades through its three programmatic pillars: science, advocacy and education. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
10
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
11
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
12
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waterorg; the most unlike its peers is Marathon Wild Bird Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $98,866 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY F…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $57,668 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $47,152 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…WATERORG: $35,000 · InternationalWATERORGAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUND…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FU…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $11,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KI…CLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · InternationalGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $86,668 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOU…MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $39,000 · PhilanthropyMIKEROWEWORKS F…MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $36,152 · OtherMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INCARTSERVEINC: $28,000 · OtherARTSERVEINCNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $14,500 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INCKIWANIS CLUB OF DAVIE AND WEST HOLLYWOOD: $11,500 · OtherKEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES INC: $35,000 · OtherKEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONA…JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $31,667 · OtherJUDICIAL WATCH INCFeeding America: $17,000 · OtherFeeding AmericaSFPBS FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · OtherSFPBS FOUNDATION INC+12 more: $37,100 · Other+12 moreCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $88,166 · HealthCANCER RESEARC…SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $14,000 · HealthSOUTH FLORIDA …PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $14,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HE…SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION: $82,166 · Civil RightsSECOND AME…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $38,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $27,000 · Environment
Education$156,534International$133,652Philanthropy$125,668Other$224,919Health$116,166Civil Rights$82,166Environment$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $98,866 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $88,166 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $86,668 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION: $82,166 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $57,668 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $47,152 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $39,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $38,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $36,152 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetWATERORG: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $31,667 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTSERVEINC: $28,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSFPBS FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $4,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMarathon Wild Bird Center Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFLORIDA KEYS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds KEYS AREA INTERDENOMINATIONAL RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERORG ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTSERVEINC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds SFPBS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Marathon Wild Bird Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA KEYS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hd Perry Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hd Perry Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Clean the World Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hd Perry Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home