Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hazlewood Barkley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$162kCrime & Legal$18kReligion$13kHuman Services$13kHealth$6kYouth Development$3kCommunity Improvement$2kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$257k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY$5,600
HEALING OUTREACH PROFESSIONAL ENDEAVOR INC$5,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$4,000
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY$2,000
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$2,000
EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$1,500
SOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY$1,000
DUBLIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$1,000
CLEBURNE ROTARY FOUNDATION$1,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$204k · 31 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
19

Total granted

$204k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+23%

Still filing today

23%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +26%
  • CO
    CASA of Johnson County Inc
    3× · 2019–2023 · $7k · revenue +24%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • JO
    JOHNSON O'CONNER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • CI
    CHRISTMAS IN ACTION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
3
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
4
Southwest Baptist University

Christ-centered, caring academic community preparing students to be servant leaders in a global society; a higher-education institution offering courses that lead to both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
Hcu Education Services
Health
7
Biola University Inc

Biola university is a private christian university located in southern california. for over 116 years, biola has stood out as an institution grounded on biblically centered education, intentional spiritual development, and career…

Education
8
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
9
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
10
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
11
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
12
Anderson University

The university is a comprehensive university affiliated with the south carolina baptist convention offering bachelors, masters, and doctorate degrees. located on approximately 398 acres in the upstate region of south carolina near the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wayland Baptist University; the most unlike its peers is Casa of Johnson County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $23,350 · OtherTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITYTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $23,013 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $15,750 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $12,208 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $12,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY: $11,750 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITYHILL COLLEGE: $10,508 · OtherHILL COLLEGEJOHNSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,500 · OtherJOHNSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERHarding University Inc: $9,500 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · Other+32 more: $58,670 · Other+32 moreCLEBURNE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $6,250 · EducationCLEBURNE …BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationBAYLOR UN…BURLESON HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNI: $2,500 · EducationBURLESON …THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationTHE BOARD…TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationTEXAS CHR…WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationWAYLAND B…CASA of Johnson County Inc: $7,000 · Crime & LegalMEALS ON WHEELS: $1,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $350 · HealthJOHNSON COUNTY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $100 · Recreation & Sports
Other$194,749Education$17,750Crime & Legal$7,000Human Services$1,000Health$350Recreation & Sports$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY: $11,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHarding University Inc: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASA of Johnson County Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCLEBURNE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $6,250 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBURLESON HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNI: $2,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON COUNTY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Harding University Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Johnson County Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLEBURNE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BURLESON HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNI ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mustang FoundationTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mustang Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hazlewood Barkley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hazlewood Barkley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hazlewood Barkley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hazlewood Barkley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hazlewood Barkley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph