Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Public charity

Hazelwood Initiative Inc

The mission of hazelwood initiative is building a stronger hazelwood through inclusive community development.

$60k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
4
Organizations funded FY2023
75%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$60,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$60,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 4
FY2022 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$17M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 75% of the organizations Hazelwood Initiative Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 85% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$60k0%
FY20234$392k75%
FY20222$140kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$380kCommunity Improvement$114kEducation$80kArts & Culture$18k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Center of Life$200,00016%
Catapult Greater Pittsburgh$180,00035%
City of Bridges CLT$113,54813%
City of Bridges$80,000125%
Industrial Arts Workshop Inc$18,43613%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · Opportunity Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Hillman Family Foundations · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Hazelwood Initiative Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hazelwood Initiative Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hazelwood Initiative Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Hazelwood Initiative Inc

How much does Hazelwood Initiative Inc give?
Hazelwood Initiative Inc reported 1 grants totaling $60,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 4 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does Hazelwood Initiative Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (64%), Community Improvement (19%), Education (14%).
Who are Hazelwood Initiative Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2024: Center of Life ($200k), Catapult Greater Pittsburgh ($180k), City of Bridges CLT ($114k).
Does Hazelwood Initiative Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Hazelwood Initiative Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Pittsburgh Foundation, The Buhl Foundation, Opportunity Foundation.
Where is Hazelwood Initiative Inc based?
Hazelwood Initiative Inc is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hazelwood Initiative’s filings →

More from the funding graph