· Private foundation
Hazel Rose Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE BANQUET NETWORK | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| GLOBAL IMPACT MINISTRY | $1,000 |
| FISHER MINSTRIES | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH | $1,000 |
| MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM | $500 |
| TODAY MINISTRIES | $500 |
| PHILLIP RENNER MINISTRIES | $500 |
| ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS | $250 |
| BEREAN BAPTIST CHURCH | $200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BANQUET NETWORK5× · 2020–2024 · $29k · revenue +59%
- MSMANDY'S SPECIAL FARM5× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +32%
- ICINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- WHWILD HEART RANCHone grant, 2020 · $1k
- KKKIRK KARNUTH MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2020 · $1k
- AOASSOC OF FAITH CHURCHESMINISTERSone grant, 2020 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
All For Jesus travels throughout the United States and to the nations of the world, boldly declaring the gospel of Christ. We believe that now is the time to see the nations bow to jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, to see the sick healed,…
To reach people with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
Fidesco recruits, trains and send volunteers to underserved areas in the world on development and humanitarian missions overseas. They offer their professional skills to those they serve fostering full human development regardless of…
World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…
We are a consortium of missionaries called to be forerunner to gospel movements amount the unreached
World outreach
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joni and Friends and the most unlike its peers is For the One Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BANQUET NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM ↗
- Who funds FISCHER MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF STARLIGHT CONCERTS INC ↗
- Who funds Philip Renner Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds FOR THE ONE INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY CHEFS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hazel Rose Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.