Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hazel L Wilbur Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$94kEnvironment$49kEducation$27kRecreation & Sports$25kReligion$25kArts & Culture$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,909
Median grant
5
States reached
$465k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Conservancy Of Southwest Florida$2,909
National Audubon Society Inc$2,909
National Wildlife Federation$2,909
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,909
Wildlife Conservation Society$2,909
The Humane Society Of The US$2,909
Individual grant recipient$2,909
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$2,909
Individual grant recipient$2,909
The Nature Conservancy Inc$2,909
The Fresh Air Fund$2,909
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 7%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 12%LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGY: $3k → 16%National Audubon Society Inc: $3k → 17%Wildlife Conservation Society: $3k → 28%The Humane Society Of The US: $3k → 14%The Conservancy Of Southwest Florida: $3k → 10%National Wildlife Federation: $3k → 6%The Nature Conservancy Inc: $3k → 7%THE COUSTEAU SOCIETY INC: $3k → 9%COUSTEAU SOCIETY: $3k → 14%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 12%LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGY: $3k → 16%National Audubon Society Inc: $3k → 17%Wildlife Conservation Society: $3k → 28%The Humane Society Of The U S: $3k → 14%The Conservancy Of Southwest Florida: $3k → 10%National Wildlife Federation: $3k → 6%The Nature Conservancy Inc: $3k → 7%THE COUSTEAU SOCIETY INC: $3k → 9%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 12%LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGY: $3k → 16%National Audubon Society Inc: $3k → 17%Wildlife Conservation Society: $3k → 28%The Humane Society Of The US: $3k → 14%The Conservancy Of Southwest Florida: $3k → 10%National Wildlife Federation: $3k → 6%The Nature Conservancy Inc: $3k → 7%BOSTON UNIVERSITY FBO SARGENT COLL: $3k → 16%UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 12%LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGY: $3k → 16%National Audubon Society Inc: $3k → 17%Wildlife Conservation Society: $3k → 28%The Humane Society Of The US: $3k → 14%The Conservancy Of Southwest Florida: $3k → 10%National Wildlife Federation: $3k → 6%The Nature Conservancy Inc: $3k → 7%CHENANGO SPCA: $3k → 12%CHENANGO SPCA: $3k → 12%The Fresh Air Fund: $3k → 17%CHENANGO SPCA: $3k → 12%The Fresh Air Fund: $3k → 17%CHENANGO SPCA: $3k → 12%The Fresh Air Fund: $3k → 17%The Fresh Air Fund: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$256k · 12 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$256k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+23%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsRecreation & SportsEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +59%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +46%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $22k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • Cornell University
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CO
    CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
6
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
7
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
10
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
11
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
12
Audubon Nature Institute Inc

Operation of museums and parks dedicated to nature on behalf of the City of New Orleans.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Nature Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $24,702 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYUNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $24,702 · OtherUNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $24,702 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $22,181 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDANational Audubon Society Inc: $22,181 · OtherNational Audubon Society IncIndividual grant recipient: $22,154 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $14,417 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYBOSTON UNIVERSITY FBO SARGENT COLL: $10,285 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSITY FBO SARGENT COLL+3 more: $7,563 · OtherWildlife Conservation Society: $24,702 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Socie…Humane World for Animals Inc: $24,702 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals In…NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $22,181 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIO…FRESH AIR FUND: $24,702 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR…The Cousteau Society Inc: $18,633 · EnvironmentCornell University: $2,548 · Education
Other$172,887Animals$71,585Recreation & Sports$24,702Environment$18,633Education$2,548

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $24,702 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $24,702 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $24,702 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $24,702 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $22,181 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $22,181 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cousteau Society Inc: $18,633 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $14,417 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $2,548 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds The Cousteau Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hazel L Wilbur Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hazel L Wilbur Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hazel L Wilbur’s filings →

More from the funding graph