Skip to content
Hastings Mutual Insurance Company Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hastings Mutual Insurance Company Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$238k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$283kHuman Services$147kReligion$87kYouth Development$85kCrime & Legal$48kArts & Culture$46kFood & Nutrition$36kHousing & Shelter$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$3,400
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pine Rest Christian Mental Health S$62,863
Truly Reaching You Inc$25,000
Degage Ministries$25,000
Safe Haven Ministries$25,000
Brown Hutcherson Ministries$15,000
Meals on Wheels of Western Michigan$12,500
New City Kids Inc$12,000
Interlochen Center for the Arts$6,000
The Baldwin Center Inc$6,000
Community Reconciliation Center Inc$5,000
Make A Wish Foundation of Michigan$5,000
Wedgewood Christian Services$5,000
GRFD Fire Prevention Foundation$5,000
Full Circle Foundation$5,000
Child and Family Charities$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Giving Songs Inc: $450 → 8%Selah's Center of Hope: $3k → 10%Friends Together: $500 → 16%YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $3k → 21%The Youth and Family Project: $500 → 6%Montpelier Community Builders Inc: $250 → 13%Children's Lantern: $500 → 11%Moms House of Toledo: $3k → 18%Child and Family Charities: $10k → 16%Christ Child Society of Detroit: $5k → 21%Mom's House Inc of Toledo: $1k → 18%Flying High Inc: $1k → 19%Oakland Family Services: $5k → 8%Child and Family Charities: $5k → 16%Full Circle Foundation: $5k → 21%1Matters Org: $1k → 18%Piggyback Foundation of Youngstown: $1k → 19%Open Door Outreach Center Inc: $2k → 8%Lott Industries Incorporated: $3k → 18%The Baldwin Center Inc: $6k → 8%Green Gables Haven: $4k → 9%Wedgwood Christian Services: $5k → 11%Degage Ministries: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Hastings Mutual Insurance Company Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Hastings Mutual Insurance Company Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$476k · 20 repeat orgs$354k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
76

Total granted

$476k
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+23%

Still filing today

60%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +152%
  • TF
    THE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    2× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +73%
  • NEW CITY KIDS INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $38k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • CF
    CASA FOR KIDS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue +20%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Greater La C
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • KP
    KEYSTONE PLACE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Outreach Center

Leading the way in promoting healthy family living by reaching out to underserved populations and those who are in our community.

—
2
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
3
Wayne County Court Appointed Special Advocates

To ensure that children who have experienced abuse and/or neglect are in safe and permanent homes by recruiting, screening and training volunteers to advocate on their behalf within the third judicial circuit court's family juvenile…

Human Services
4
Child and Family Services of the Upper Peninsula Inc

To strengthen, nuture and empower children and families for a brighter future by providing programs that preserve the dignity and enhance the well-being of families throughout michigan's upper peninsula, in a caring, compassionate and…

Human Services
5
Hope House of Northwest Michigan

Hope house of northwest michigan is a non-profit christian maternity home that provides a safe loving residential environment for single expectant young women. through up to two years of residence the organization offers housing baby…

Human Services
6
Caring House Inc

To promote a violence free atmosphere from domestic and sexual violence in which survivors can recognize their options to have the opportunity to continue living violence free and regain their sense of self-worth; to educate and raise…

Human Services
7
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
8
Decatur Cooperative Ministry Inc

Decatur cooperative ministry helps families facing homelessness settle into safe, stable homes and build healthy lives filled with peace, hope and opportunity.

—
9
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
10
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
11
Association for Children's Mental Health

To ensure all michigan children and youth with emotional, behavioral, or mental health challenges and their families live in a safe, welcoming community with access to needed services and supports.

Health
12
Muskogee County Child Advocacy Center Inc

Kids space is a child focused center that provides and coordinates professional on-site medical treatment, forensic interviews, and mental health services for child abuse victims, their non-offending caregivers, and victims of sexual…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Degage Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Miles Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/69
Grantees still filing
46/69
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pine Rest Christian Mental Health S: $241,566 · OtherPine Rest Christian Mental Health SCASA FOR KIDS INC: $18,125 · Other+79 more: $247,710 · Other+79 moreDEGAGE MINISTRIES: $25,000 · Human ServicesDEGAGE MINIS…Child and Family Charities: $15,000 · Human ServicesChild and Fa…THE BALDWIN CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE BALDWIN …THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST C…FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFULL CIRCLE …OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $5,000 · Human ServicesOAKLAND FAMI…WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5,000 · Human ServicesWEDGWOOD CHR…MOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO: $4,895 · Human ServicesMOM'S HOUSE …GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $4,000 · Human Services+12 more: $15,428 · Human Services+12 moreSAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterSAFE HAVEN …KEYSTONE PLACE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterKEYSTONE PL…CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES: $4,000 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $3,750 · Housing & ShelterNEW CITY KIDS INC: $38,000 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $2,100 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $40,400 · Arts & CultureINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTruly Reaching You Inc: $25,000 · Crime & LegalCAMP ROGER: $16,000 · Recreation & SportsTALL TURF MINISTRIES: $7,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$507,401Human Services$90,323Housing & Shelter$87,750Youth Development$50,100Arts & Culture$46,400Crime & Legal$25,000Recreation & Sports$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $70,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE FLINT CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $40,400 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetNEW CITY KIDS INC: $38,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDEGAGE MINISTRIES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTruly Reaching You Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCASA FOR KIDS INC: $18,125 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCAMP ROGER: $16,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetChild and Family Charities: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEYSTONE PLACE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLiving Stones Academy: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTALL TURF MINISTRIES: $7,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BALDWIN CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPARC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSandco Industries: $5,918 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTBEAT OF FREMONT: $5,450 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY: $5,390 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRY COUNTY UNITED WAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO: $4,895 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFISH TALES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREEN GABLES HAVEN: $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEL AND JEAN DOYLE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TROY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSELAHS CENTER OF HOPE INC: $2,700 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLOTT INDUSTRIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRULIGHT MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPackard Health Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDS 4 KIDS: $2,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMICHELLE MARIE LUNN HOPE FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetOPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER INC: $1,841 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHWE: $1,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM A LA CART: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget1MATTERSORG: $1,187 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DEFIANCE COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILDWOOD HILLS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF MAHONING COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy Foun…DTE Energy FoundationCommunity Foundation …Grand Rapids Communit…Douglas & Maria Devos…Peter C & Emajean Coo…Premier Bank Foundati…The Carls FoundationDick and Betsy Devos …Heart of West Michiga…Barnabas FoundationUnited Way for Southe…
Consumers Energy FoundationMI26.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · The Carls Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Barnabas Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hastings Mutual Insurance Company Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hastings Mutual Insurance Company Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hastings Mutual Insurance Company’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home