· Private foundation
Hasna
HASNA'S MISSION IS TO FACILITATE CROSS-CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN COMMUNITIES DIVIDED ALONG ETHNIC, RELIGIOUS, RACIAL, GENDER, AND NATIONAL LINES; AND REDUCE BARRIERS TO INTEGRATION AND POSITIVE PEACE.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $238k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CIVITY | $35,000 |
| MARYLAND HORSE RESCUE | $30,000 |
| CAMP GRIER | $17,500 |
| NC STATE STUDENT AID | $15,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| THE ARROWHEAD ARTISTS AND ARTISANS | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| TASCA'S LOVE CO-OP | $10,000 |
| FOOD JUSTICE DMV | $10,000 |
| NCVMF | $10,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE | $10,000 |
| THE PENNIMAN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SPUR LOCAL | $10,000 |
| DEMOCRACY FORWARD | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY MEDITATION CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $176k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLSPUR LOCAL INC3× · 2023–2025 · $94k · revenue +24%
- MHMaryland Horse Rescue3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +1%
- AFALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC2× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +100%
Funded once
- BBECAone grant, 2024 · $15k
- MPMONA PANTS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $10k
- OCONE COMMON UNITYone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.
Community of hope's mission is to improve health, end homelessness, and partner with communities to make washington, dc more equitable.
Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
United planning organization's mission is uniting people with opportunities.
Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.
DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.
Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.
Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…
OAR is a community-based nonprofit organization that envisions a safe and thriving community where those impacted by the legal system enjoy equal civil and human rights. Continued in Schedule O . . .
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
The mission of the d.c. policy center is to arm decision makers with fact-based, unbiased, and reliable research and analyses to help create a vibrant local economy that can maximize opportunities for residents, workers, and businesses in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spur Local Inc and the most unlike its peers is Maryland Horse Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPUR LOCAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Maryland Horse Rescue ↗
- Who funds THE UMSTEAD COALITION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MEDIATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAVING GRACE ANIMALS FOR ADOPTION ↗
- Who funds Camp Grier ↗
- Who funds PEACE FOR DC ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ONE COMMON UNITY ↗
- Who funds Alliance of Concerned Men ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD ↗
- Who funds The Arc of North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds Little Friends for Peace Inc ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN SEED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds NEGOTIATION WORKS ↗
- Who funds OAKS AND SPOKES ↗
- Who funds FAIR CHANCE ↗
- Who funds NeighborHealth Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hasna funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.