Skip to content
Hasna at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Hasna

HASNA'S MISSION IS TO FACILITATE CROSS-CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN COMMUNITIES DIVIDED ALONG ETHNIC, RELIGIOUS, RACIAL, GENDER, AND NATIONAL LINES; AND REDUCE BARRIERS TO INTEGRATION AND POSITIVE PEACE.

$271k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Community Improvement$285kAnimals$76kPhilanthropy$65kCrime & Legal$50kInternational$40kEnvironment$35kYouth Development$30kHealth$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $238k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CIVITY$35,000
MARYLAND HORSE RESCUE$30,000
CAMP GRIER$17,500
NC STATE STUDENT AID$15,500
HAVEN HOUSE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COMMUNITY MEDITATION CENTER$10,000
THE GO GO MUSUEM$10,000
FOOD JUSTICE DMV$10,000
TASCA'S LOVE CO-OP$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
DEMOCRACY FORWARD$10,000
SPUR LOCAL$10,000
ALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE$10,000
NCVMF$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOMESTRETCH: $520 → 4%MOUNTAIN SEED FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%THE ARC OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5k → 8%THE ARC OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5k → 8%FAIR CHANCE: $5k → 14%NEGOTIATION WORKS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$373k · 11 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$373k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+18%

Still filing today

82%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $176k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SPUR LOCAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $94k · revenue +24%
  • MH
    Maryland Horse Rescue
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +1%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • B
    BECA
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • MP
    MONA PANTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • AO
    Alliance of Concerned Men
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition
2
Community of Hope

Community of hope's mission is to improve health, end homelessness, and partner with communities to make washington, dc more equitable.

Community Improvement
3
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
4
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
5
United Planning Organization

United planning organization's mission is uniting people with opportunities.

Human Services
6
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
7
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
8
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
9
Cleveland Mediation Center

Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…

Crime & Legal
10
Offender Aid & Restoration Arlington Co Oar Arlington Alexandria Falls Church

OAR is a community-based nonprofit organization that envisions a safe and thriving community where those impacted by the legal system enjoy equal civil and human rights. Continued in Schedule O . . .

Crime & Legal
11
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
12
Dc Policy Center

The mission of the d.c. policy center is to arm decision makers with fact-based, unbiased, and reliable research and analyses to help create a vibrant local economy that can maximize opportunities for residents, workers, and businesses in…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spur Local Inc; the most unlike its peers is Maryland Horse Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE PENNIMAN FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherTHE PENNIMAN FOUNDATIONCIVITY: $35,000 · OtherCIVITYNC STATE STUDENT AID: $15,500 · OtherBECA: $15,000 · OtherPEACE FOR DC: $15,000 · Other+26 more: $192,016 · Other+26 moreSPUR LOCAL INC: $93,557 · PhilanthropySPUR LOCAL INCTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATI…Maryland Horse Rescue: $50,000 · AnimalsMaryland H…SAVING GRACE ANIMALS FOR ADOPTION: $18,750 · AnimalsSAVING GRA…THE UMSTEAD COALITION: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsCamp Grier: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureONE COMMON UNITY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe Arc of North Carolina Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN SEED FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEGOTIATION WORKS: $5,113 · Human ServicesFAIR CHANCE: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $520 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY MEDIATION CENTER: $30,000 · Civil Rights
Other$352,516Philanthropy$143,557Animals$68,750Recreation & Sports$52,500Arts & Culture$40,000Human Services$30,633Civil Rights$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPUR LOCAL INC: $93,557 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMaryland Horse Rescue: $50,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetTHE UMSTEAD COALITION: $35,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDIATION CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetSAVING GRACE ANIMALS FOR ADOPTION: $18,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPEACE FOR DC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOME INC: $10,326 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arc of North Carolina Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlliance of Concerned Men: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLittle Friends for Peace Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMOUNTAIN SEED FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $5,145 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEGOTIATION WORKS: $5,113 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNeighborHealth Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRead Early and Daily READ: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE OUTREACH CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHomestretch Inc: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPUR LOCAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Maryland Horse Rescue ↗
  • Who funds THE UMSTEAD COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MEDIATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE ANIMALS FOR ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds Camp Grier ↗
  • Who funds PEACE FOR DC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of North Carolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds Alliance of Concerned Men ↗
  • Who funds ONE COMMON UNITY ↗
  • Who funds Little Friends for Peace Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN SEED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEGOTIATION WORKS ↗
  • Who funds OAKS AND SPOKES ↗
  • Who funds FAIR CHANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Co…John Edward Fowler Me…Duke Energy FoundationThe Morris and Gwendo…American Tower Corpor…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Charities Aid Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Endowment Fo…
Greater Washington Community FoundationDC21.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hasna funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hasna. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hasna’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home