Skip to content

· Private foundation

Haselton Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$218kHuman Services$90kFood & Nutrition$39kEducation$37kPublic Benefit$32kPhilanthropy$30kAnimals$12kEmployment$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$13,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$12,300
FARM AID$6,115
DIABETES ACTION RESEARCH EDUCATION$5,620
THE JIMMY FUND$5,000
UNITED THROUGH READING$4,000
MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FNDN$4,000
NAMI MASSACHUSETTS$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
SALVATION ARMY$3,000
NAMI - MAINE$3,000
MAINE PUBLIC$2,737
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,500
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$2,500
MSPMLC$2,080
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $7k → 8%UNITED THROUGH READING: $5k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $14k → 17%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FNDN: $5k → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 9%NAMI - MAINE: $3k → 12%PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $6k → 8%UNITED THROUGH READING: $5k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $11k → 17%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FNDN: $5k → 7%UNITED THROUGH READING: $5k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $11k → 17%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FNDN: $5k → 7%NAMI MASSACHUSETTS: $5k → 16%UNITED THROUGH READING: $5k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $11k → 17%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FNDN: $4k → 7%UNITED THROUGH READING: $4k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $9k → 17%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FNDN: $4k → 7%UNITED THROUGH READING: $4k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FNDN: $4k → 7%UNITED THROUGH READING: $4k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%AMERICAN DIABETES ASOC: $6k → 7%FARM AID: $8k → 8%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $8k → 17%AMERICAN DIABETES ASOC: $6k → 7%FARM AID: $6k → 8%BRAIN BEHAVIOR RESEARCH: $5k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $7k → 17%AMERICAN DIABETES ASOC: $6k → 7%FARM AID: $6k → 8%BRAIN BEHAVIOR RESEARCH: $5k → 17%AMERICAN DIABETES ASOC: $6k → 7%FARM AID: $6k → 8%BRAIN BEHAVIOR RESEARCH: $5k → 17%AMERICAN DIABETES ASOC: $5k → 7%FARM AID: $5k → 8%BRAIN BEHAVIOR RESEARCH: $5k → 17%FARM AID: $5k → 8%BRAIN BEHAVIOR RESEARCH: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
IA
CA
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$535k · 21 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$535k
$2k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +145%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +90%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • PC
    PHYSICIAN COMMITTEE FOR RESP MED
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
4
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
5
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
6
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
7
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
11
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Alliance On Mental Illness of Massachusetts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $85,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $45,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $27,000 · HealthNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF MAS…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS AS…NAMI MAINE: $18,000 · HealthNAMI MAINE+1 more: $5,000 · HealthIndividual grant recipient: $31,766 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…SALVATION ARMY: $13,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYDIABETES ACTION RESEARCH EDUCATION: $11,240 · OtherDIABETES ACTION RESEARCH…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $7,000 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIESUSO: $7,000 · OtherUSOASPCA - ANGELL: $7,000 · OtherASPCA - ANGELLMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $6,817 · Other+3 moreWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $77,358 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR P…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National…FARM AID INC: $38,845 · Food & NutritionTrustees of Tufts College: $17,500 · EducationPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $17,500 · EducationUNITED THROUGH READING: $32,000 · Public BenefitMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Health$205,000Other$118,823Human Services$82,358Food & Nutrition$38,845Education$35,000Public Benefit$32,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $85,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $77,358 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFARM AID INC: $38,845 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED THROUGH READING: $32,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $27,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI MAINE: $18,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Public Broadcasting Corporation: $2,737 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds FARM AID INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED THROUGH READING ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MAINE ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Maine Public Broadcasting Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haselton Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haselton Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Farm Aid Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Perkins School for the Blind: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Haselton Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Haselton Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haselton Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph