Skip to content
Harry Dent Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Harry Dent Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$313k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$268k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$1.5MArts & Culture$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$8kReligion$8kEnvironment$5kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $268k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CTR INC$267,500
BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$10,000
CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO$5,000
WINDSTAR CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ASHFORD HOLLOW FOUNDATION$5,000
ST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF AMERICA$5,000
WESTERN NEW YORK HERITAGE PRESS INC$2,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC$2,500
CALVERT VAUX PRESERVATION ALLIANCE$1,250
HUDSONIA LIMITED$1,250
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK$1,250
THE CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS AT RHINEBECK$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CALVERT VAUX PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $2k → 9%DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CTR INC: $280k → 13%YOUNGSTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $5k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK: $2k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%WINDSTAR CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $5k → 14%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $3k → 6%CALVERT VAUX PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $1k → 9%DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CTR INC: $268k → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK: $1k → 17%WINDSTAR CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%THE CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS AT RHINEBECK: $1k → 9%DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CTR INC: $265k → 13%CALVERT VAUX PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $1k → 9%DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CTR INC: $230k → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE MID-HUDSON VALLEY INC: $2k → 9%DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CTR INC: $223k → 13%HUDSONIA LIMITED: $3k → 9%DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CTR INC: $222k → 13%HUDSONIA LIMITED: $2k → 9%WINDSONG CARES FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%HUDSONIA LIMITED: $1k → 9%WILLIAMSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 13%WILLIAMSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 13%WESTERN NEW YORK HERITAGE PRESS INC: $3k → 13%WESTERN NEW YORK HERITAGE PRESS INC: $3k → 13%WESTERN NEW YORK HERITAGE PRESS INC: $3k → 13%BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $10k → 13%BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $10k → 13%BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $10k → 13%ASHFORD HOLLOW FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $3k → 13%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $3k → 13%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 11 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$1.6M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+2%

Still filing today

73%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DN
    DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +58%
  • BT
    BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +21%
  • CF
    CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • WC
    WINDSONG CARES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • YV
    YOUNGSTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Physicians Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
2
Ny New Hope Pregnancy Resource Center
—
3
Planned Parenthood of Central and Western New York Inc

Planned parenthood of the central and western new york, inc (ppcwny) is a nonprofit organization that provides reproductive health care to men and women in the central and western ny area. ppcwny is licensed by new york state article 28 of…

Health
4
Breast Cancer Network of Western New Yorkinc

Our mission is to support the well being of all western new yorkers impacted by breast cancer.

Health
5
The Western New York Foundation
—
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Foundation for Research of the New York Academy of Osteopathy Inc
—
8
Northwell Health Cancer Institute Inc

Northwell health cancer institute is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
9
New York Firefights Heart Foundation

Increase public awareness of the incidence of heart and respiratory ailments among firefighters;provide funding to support, promote, foster and encourage research on causes, early detection, care and treatment.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
The Westchester Medical Practice Pc

The westchester medical practice, p.c dba new york presbyterian medical group/hudson valley is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the sole purpose of supporting and furthering the charitable purposes of the hudson valley…

Health
11
Newyork-Presbyterianqueens

To be the premier healthcare institution serving our greater community by providing excellence in clinical care and patient safety, education, clinical research, and service.

Health
12
Northern York County Historical & Preservation Society
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of the Mid-Hudson Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CENTER INC: $1,487,640 · HealthDENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CENTER INC+3 more: $20,750 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF AMERICA: $7,500 · OtherASHFORD HOLLOW FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL PERFORMING ARTS: $5,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $5,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE MID-HUDSON VALLEY INC: $1,500 · OtherYOUNGSTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $5,000 · OtherCALVERT VAUX PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $3,750 · Other+1 more: $1,250 · OtherBUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsWINDSTAR CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWINDSONG CARES FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyWESTERN NEW YORK HERITAGE INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureHUDSONIA LIMITED: $5,250 · EnvironmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · International
Health$1,508,390Other$44,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Philanthropy$17,500Arts & Culture$7,500Environment$5,250International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CENTER INC: $1,487,640 over 6y, 11% of budgetBUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWINDSTAR CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetWINDSONG CARES FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetWESTERN NEW YORK HERITAGE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHUDSONIA LIMITED: $5,250 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCALVERT VAUX PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $3,750 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harry Dent Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harry Dent Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harry Dent Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Harry Dent Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harry Dent Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home