Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harriet & Joe Foster Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$218k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of Harriet & Joe Foster Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $180k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$732k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Harriet & Joe Foster Family YMCA$40,000
Houston Food Bank$20,000
Texas A&M$20,000
University of St Thomas$20,000
The Hobby Center$15,000
Center for Pursuit$15,000
Houston Hospice$10,000
Down Syndrome Association of Houston$10,000
San Jose Clinic$10,000
Christus Healthcare Foundation$10,000
Catholic Charities Archdiocese Galveston$10,000
Cristo Rey Jesuit College$6,500
Trees for Houston$6,000
Reach Unlimited$5,000
The Women's Fund$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $3k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $3k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON AREA: $40k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON AREA: $40k → 16%PRISON ENTRPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM: $5k → 16%THE CENTER FOR PURSUIT: $16k → 16%Center for Pursuit: $15k → 16%NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%Reach Unlimited: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 27 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
11

Total granted

$2.0M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+5%

Still filing today

67%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $103k · revenue +90%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +107%
  • CF
    CHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare
    3× · 2017–2019 · $65k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -25%
  • United Way of Greater Houston
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +5%
  • TV
    THE VILLAGE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
2
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
3
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

4
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center

The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.

Human Services
5
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
6
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
8
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Rebuilding Together Houston

Rebuilding Together Houston is the only organization in Houston and Harris County providing free home repairs to hundreds of families each year. We employ licensed contractors to restore homes to safe, livable conditions, extending each…

Housing & Shelter
10
Houston Academy of Medicine

The mission of the Houston Academy of Medicine is to support the community service, education, scientific, and charitable programs for physicians, their patients, and the community at large in Harris County.

Education
11
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
12
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Achievement Place and the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUrban Parks & Nature Conser…Developmental Disabilities …Community Health CentersHomeless Services & HousingK-12 Education Improvement
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number30%0%<5yr17%4%5–10yr21%4%10–20yr18%8%20–35yr8%42%35–55yr8%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value30%0%<5yr17%1%5–10yr21%5%10–20yr18%2%20–35yr8%43%35–55yr8%49%55yr+

The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
19%
3,802/20,414

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL — $500,000 · OtherHOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITALST THOMAS UNIVERSITY — $160,000 · OtherST THOMAS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - HEALTH SCIENCE — $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - HEALTH SCIENCEThe Houston Food Bank — $97,500 · OtherThe Houston Food BankSAN JOSE CLINIC — $55,000 · Other+21 more — $425,250 · Other+21 moreYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area — $295,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christia…HOME RUN HITTERS INTERNATIONAL INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesHOME RUN HITTERS INT…THE CENTER FOR PURSUIT — $31,400 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR PURSU…+4 more — $20,000 · Human ServicesHOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE — $65,000 · HealthCHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare — $65,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC — $25,000 · HealthTexas A&M Foundation — $102,500 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $25,000 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas — $20,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationGirl Scouts of San Jacinto Council — $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAYS OF TEXAS INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Houston — $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BUCKINGHAM FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyJohn P McGovern Museum of Health & Medical Science — $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,387,750Human Services$401,400Health$155,000Education$152,500Youth Development$55,000Philanthropy$45,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area — $295,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $102,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $97,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE — $65,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare — $65,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOME RUN HITTERS INTERNATIONAL INC — $55,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetGirl Scouts of San Jacinto Council — $55,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON INC — $45,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTrees For Houston — $38,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHouston Hospice — $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PURSUIT — $31,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJohn P McGovern Museum of Health & Medical Science — $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBuffalo Bayou Partnership Inc — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAYS OF TEXAS INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH CAREPARTNERS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S HOME — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUCKINGHAM FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRISON ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds HOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE
  • Who funds CHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare
  • Who funds HOME RUN HITTERS INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of San Jacinto Council
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON INC
  • Who funds Trees For Houston
  • Who funds Houston Hospice
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PURSUIT
  • Who funds John P McGovern Museum of Health & Medical Science
  • Who funds Buffalo Bayou Partnership Inc
  • Who funds UNITED WAYS OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC
  • Who funds University of St Thomas
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Houston
  • Who funds INTERFAITH CAREPARTNERS INC
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S HOME
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable FoundationTX24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Strake Foundation · MD Anderson Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · John P McGovern Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Robert W Knox & Pearl Wallis Knox Charitable · Fred and Mabel R Parks Foundation · The Elkins Foundation · The William Stamps Farish Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harriet & Joe Foster Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harriet & Joe Foster Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Harriet & Joe Foster Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph