Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harpley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Harpley Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Harpley Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $40k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
7
’18
4
’19
7
’20
9
’21
0
’22
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.0MRecreation & Sports$101kAnimals$47kHuman Services$45kArts & Culture$33kFood & Nutrition$28kHousing & Shelter$23kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CASS - CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES$10,000
WALTHAM FIELDS COMMUNITY GARDEN$5,000
ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
JEANNA GEIGER CRISIS CENTER$2,500
MYSTIC VALLEY ELDER SERVICES$2,500
FIREHOUSE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,030
ACTORS STUDIO OF NEWBURYPORT$1,000
UNDERSTANDING DISABILITIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MISSION OF DEEDS: $6k → 8%MISSION OF DEEDS: $4k → 8%MISSION OF DEEDS: $3k → 8%JEANNA GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 10%JEANNA GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $3k → 10%NOT MY KID INC: $5k → 11%MISSION OF DEEDS: $3k → 8%JEANNA GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $3k → 10%NOT MY KID INC: $5k → 11%MYSTIC VALLEY ELDER SERVICES: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 15 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$270k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+150%

Still filing today

67%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $23k · revenue +72%
  • MO
    Mission of Deeds Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $15k · revenue +59%
  • AH
    Arizona Humane Society
    3× · 2019–2021 · $13k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • R3
    READING 375
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • CA
    CREATIVE ARTS
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • E
    EMARC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
2
Upper Valley Humane Society Inc

UVHS improves quality of life for people and pets through an innovative animal shelter and adoption center and through services that reduce suffering, support wellness, and foster compassion.

Animals
3
New England Humane Society Inc

New England Humane Society has four parts to it's mission: Rescue, Heal, Adopt, Educate. Rescue: NEHS attempts to save animals who are in high-kill shelters and are on the verge of being euthanized due to pet over population. We also…

Animals
4
Northeast Animal Shelter Inc

To provide, promote, and advance humane protection, care and treatment of animals thru education of the public and the operation of an animal shelter which cares for, spays and neuters, and places homeless pets in permanent homes.

—
5
Animal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard Inc

The mission of the Animal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard is to provide shelter, health care, lover and support to all domestic animals until a permanent home is found for them.

Animals
6
Animal Rescue League of New Bedford Inc Dba Humane Society&Shelter-Southcoast

Animal rescue league of new bedford, inc., d/b/a humane society & shelter-southcoast, provides services to reduce the number of homeless pets. the organization provides quarantine services to other rescue organizations bringing animals…

Animals
7
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
8
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
9
Humane Society of the North Bay

Our mission is to provide shelter and compassionate care to our community's animals in need, offer programs that improve thier lives and strengthen the lifelong committment between animals and people.

Animals
10
Here Today Adopted Tomorrow Animal Sanctuary Inc

We focus on keeping pets with the people who love them. the organization has a cage-free adoption center for cats and kittens in brimfield, massachusetts. the organization also provides services and resources for local animals and…

Animals
11
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
12
Bristol Humane Society Inc

As a nonprofit organization, the mission of bristol humane society is to provide accessible resources to ensure that animals are healthy and happy, and the bond between pets and their families is strengthened, allowing every animal to…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mystic Valley Aging Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Texas Diaper Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,036,625 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $101,200 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF …WALTHAM FIELDS COMMUNITY GARDEN: $27,500 · OtherWALTHAM FIELDS COM…Individual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…ANGELS FOR ANIMALS: $15,000 · OtherANGELS FOR ANIMALSIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…THE NATURE CONNECTION INC: $10,000 · Other+12 more: $39,180 · Other+12 moreMission of Deeds Inc: $15,175 · Human ServicesJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNOTMYKID: $10,000 · Human ServicesMYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesArizona Humane Society: $12,500 · AnimalsLOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,800 · AnimalsMERRIMACK RIVER FELINE RESCUE SOCIETY INC: $8,000 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsSOCIETY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTS: $9,500 · Arts & CultureREADING COMMUNITY SINGERS INC: $7,125 · Arts & CultureBREAD & ROSES PRESENTS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureActors Studio of Newburyport Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyTEXAS DIAPER BANK: $250 · Health
Community Improvement$1,036,625Other$223,880Human Services$37,675Animals$31,300Arts & Culture$22,625Housing & Shelter$22,500Philanthropy$500Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,036,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMission of Deeds Inc: $15,175 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONNECTION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,800 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTS: $9,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREADING COMMUNITY SINGERS INC: $7,125 over 2y, 16% of budgetBREAD & ROSES PRESENTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetActors Studio of Newburyport Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS DIAPER BANK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission of Deeds Inc ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NOTMYKID ↗
  • Who funds LOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MERRIMACK RIVER FELINE RESCUE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds READING COMMUNITY SINGERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD & ROSES PRESENTS ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds Actors Studio of Newburyport Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS DIAPER BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc)MA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Foundation M · Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harpley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harpley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Reading Community Singers Inc: 17% of income from government
  • The Nature Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Actors Studio of Newburyport Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harpley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harpley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harpley’s filings →

More from the funding graph