Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harper Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$19kRecreation & Sports$12kHuman Services$11kHealth$6kYouth Development$5kArts & Culture$4kInternational$2kFood & Nutrition$515Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $26k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,030
Median grant
5
States reached
$384k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA ACADEMY FOUNDATION$100,000
THE LILABEAN FOUNDATION$6,750
WOMENS CLUB OF GREAT FALLS SCH$5,091
GREAT FALLS LITTLE LEAGUE$2,700
GREAT FALLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,570
KIDS GIVE BACK$1,545
BEST BUDDIES INTERNATIONAL$1,544
MARCH OF DIMES$1,030
THREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL$1,030
CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION$1,030
COMMUNITY CHURCH$1,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA$525
TAPS$520
ST JUDE$500
AMERICAN FOUNDATION$261
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SECOND STORY: $2k → 6%SECOND STORY: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 12 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$73k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+8%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LILABEAN FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +59%
  • AA
    ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +36%
  • KG
    Kids Give Back
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • VC
    VIRGINIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS GREAT GREAT FALLS ELEMENTARY PTA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -54%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF RIVERBEND PARK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
2
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
United States Fund for Unicef

The organization's mission is to relentlessly pursue a better world for every child. unicef usa advances the global mission of unicef by rallying the american public to support the world's most vulnerable children. through fundraising,…

International
5
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
6
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
7
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
8
St Baldrick's Foundation Inc

The st. baldrick's foundation is a volunteer and donor powered charity committed to supporting the most promising research to fund cures for childhood cancers and give survivors long and healthy lives.

Philanthropy
9
National Brain Tumor Society Inc

National brain tumor society unrelentingly invests in, mobilizes, andunites our community to discover a cure, deliver effective treatments,and advocate for patients and care partners.

—
10
Lymphoma Research Foundation

To eradicate lymphoma and serve those touched by this disease.

Health
11
United World Schools Usa Inc

To empower every child in marginalized communities to reach their full potential by ensuring foundational learning.

Education
12
The Parent Project for Muscular Dystrophy Research Inc

The parent project muscular dystrophy (ppmd) fights to end duchenne. we accelerate research, raise our voices to impact policy, demand optimal care for every single family, and strive to ensure access to approved therapies.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherVIRGINIA ACADEMY FOUNDATIONWOMENS CLUB OF GREAT FALLS SCH: $15,868 · OtherWOMENS CLUB OF GREAT FALLS SCHLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $12,700 · OtherLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INCGREAT FALLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $11,613 · OtherGREAT FALLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $7,651 · Other+11 more: $9,844 · Other+11 moreTHE LILABEAN FOUNDATION INC: $7,850 · HealthULMAN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,060 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,060 · HealthTHE CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $1,030 · HealthBest Buddies International Inc: $3,088 · InternationalTHREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL: $1,030 · InternationalSCHOOL OF THEATRICAL DANCE: $4,070 · Arts & CultureABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $2,600 · Human ServicesKids Give Back: $2,575 · Youth Development
Other$157,676Health$14,500International$4,118Arts & Culture$4,070Human Services$2,600Youth Development$2,575

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC: $12,700 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetTHE LILABEAN FOUNDATION INC: $7,850 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSCHOOL OF THEATRICAL DANCE: $4,070 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $3,088 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKids Give Back: $2,575 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetVIRGINIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS GREAT GREAT FALLS ELEMENTARY PTA: $2,570 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetULMAN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,060 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LILABEAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF THEATRICAL DANCE ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Kids Give Back ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS GREAT GREAT FALLS ELEMENTARY PTA ↗
  • Who funds ULMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE ROOTS INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harper Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harper Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harper Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Harper Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harper Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph