Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harold Warren Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$576kReligion$241kArts & Culture$101kFood & Nutrition$63kPhilanthropy$52kHealth$50kHousing & Shelter$25kRecreation & Sports$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k56 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $94k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS$35,000
HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$31,500
HARTWELL FIRST METHODIST CHURCH$27,000
HART COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL$8,000
HART PARTNERSCIS OF HART COUNTY INC$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
ELBERT COUNTY FOOD MINISTRY$2,500
HART COUNTY COMMUNITY THEATRE$2,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$2,000
BELL FAMILY YMCA$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $4k → 15%DAWSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 29%PLEASANT GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH: $59k → 16%SAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS: $35k → 16%SAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS: $28k → 16%PLEASANT GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH: $30k → 16%SAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS: $15k → 16%SAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS: $15k → 16%ELBERT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $50k → 16%COLDWATER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 16%COLDWATER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 16%ELBERT COUNTY FEED THE HUNGRY: $4k → 16%NORTH HART ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5k → 14%TORCH OF HARTWELL: $50k → 14%HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $32k → 14%HARTWELL FIRST METHODIST CHURCH: $30k → 14%HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $29k → 14%HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $29k → 14%HARTWELL FIRST METHODIST CHURCH: $27k → 14%HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $23k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $21k → 14%HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $18k → 14%HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 14%FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF HARTWELL: $12k → 14%HART COUNTY CLOTHES CLOSET & FOOD PANTRY INC: $12k → 14%HART COUNTY CLOTHES CLOSET & FOOD PANTRY INC: $11k → 14%HART COUNTY CLOTHES CLOSET & FOOD PANTRY INC: $11k → 14%HART COUNTY CLOTHES CLOSET & FOOD PANTRY INC: $10k → 14%HART COUNTY CLOTHES CLOSET & FOOD PANTRY INC: $10k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 14%HART COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL: $8k → 14%HARTWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $8k → 14%HART COUNTY YMCA: $8k → 14%HARTWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $7k → 14%HARTWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5k → 14%HART COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 14%HART PARTNERSCIS OF HART COUNTY INC: $5k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 14%HART PARTNERS: $5k → 14%SOUTH HART ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5k → 14%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $4k → 14%HART COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL: $4k → 14%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $4k → 14%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $4k → 14%HARTWELL MAIN STREET: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$915k · 120 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

120 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 84 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

120
84

Total granted

$915k
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+160%

Still filing today

2%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $143k
  • SR
    SAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $95k
  • PG
    PLEASANT GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $89k

Funded once

  • EM
    ELBERT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • DU
    DAWSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • FM
    FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF HARTWELL
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hart Research Center Inc

Actively fulfill the Gospel Commission by impacting commitment and action for Jesus Christ in both clergy and lay persons through research and development of creative ideas and concepts for materials and methodologies to equip people with…

Religion
2
Hart Interdenominational Ministry Inc

The mission of the Hart Interdenominational Ministry is to connect people in need with churches and social agencies that will provide the appropriate help, support and education that will not only meet the present need but will enable them…

Public Benefit
3
Friends of Hart Inc

Produced plays and performances for the community using resources of over 400 volunteers, actors, stage crews and organizers

Arts & Culture
4
Hart Life Pregnancy Care Center Inc

To compassionately engage, educate, and inspire our community with the truth regarding sexual integrity and the value of human life.

Human Services
5
Hartsville Interfaith Ministries

The organization provides financial assistance to persons in need with rent, utilities, temporary lodging, prescription medicine, medical care, as well as food and hygiene

Human Services
6
Humanitarian Aid Response Teams Foundation

Provide medical educational, and spiritual help to poor in eastern europe, with a focus on ukraine; equip christian leaders and christian churches.

International
7
Servant Harts

Through healing, building, and educating, Servant Harts exists to provide high quality care to malnourished babies and pregnant women in and around San Lorenzo, El Tejar.

International
8
Hands of Christ

To help children in need by providing clothing and school supplies at the start of the school year

Food & Nutrition
9
Hart County Botanical Garden Inc

To create a public garden that will be a place of beauty in Hart County, providing education, enrichment and enjoyment to all who visit.

Environment
10
Habitat for Humanity International

Construction of affordable housing for deserving qualifying families; necessary home repairs for low-income individuals at no cost to the homeowner.

—
11
Hart High School Foundation

To promote, encourage and support programs and projects of hart high school

Philanthropy
12
Hart Community Performing Arts Association

To encourage the appreciation, study, and performance of musical arts; to provide musical performances inclusive of concerts and theatrical events to members of our immediate and surrounding counties, and to provide local high school and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hart Regional Arts Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sid Luke Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 227 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $143,000 · OtherHART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLSAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS INC: $95,000 · OtherSAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS INCPLEASANT GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH: $89,000 · OtherPLEASANT GROVE BAPTIST CHURCHHARTWELL FIRST METHODIST CHURCH: $57,000 · OtherHart County Clothes Closet Food Pantry Inc: $54,000 · OtherTORCH OF HARTWELL INC: $51,800 · OtherELBERT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $50,000 · Other+189 more: $570,850 · Other+189 moreHart Partners Inc: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentEMMANUEL UNIVERSITY INC: $4,000 · EducationHart Regional Arts Council Inc: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,110,650Youth Development$9,000Education$4,000Arts & Culture$2,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHart County Clothes Closet Food Pantry Inc: $54,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetHart County Habitat for Humanity: $5,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetHart Partners Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetEMMANUEL UNIVERSITY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHart County Community Theatre Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hart County Clothes Closet Food Pantry Inc ↗
  • Who funds SID LUKE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Hart County Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds Hart Partners Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold Warren Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold Warren Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 227 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harold Warren’s filings →

    More from the funding graph