· Private foundation
Harold Warren Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k56 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $94k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS | $35,000 |
| HART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL | $31,500 |
| HARTWELL FIRST METHODIST CHURCH | $27,000 |
| HART COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL | $8,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $5,000 |
| HART PARTNERSCIS OF HART COUNTY INC | $5,000 |
| ELBERT COUNTY FOOD MINISTRY | $2,500 |
| BELL FAMILY YMCA | $2,000 |
| HART COUNTY COMMUNITY THEATRE | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
120 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2025, 84 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHART COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL6× · 2020–2025 · $143k
- SRSAVANNAH RIVER PRODUCTIONS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $95k
- PGPLEASANT GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH2× · 2020–2021 · $89k
Funded once
- EMELBERT MEMORIAL HOSPITALone grant, 2022 · $50k
- DUDAWSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $25k
- FMFIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF HARTWELLone grant, 2023 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Actively fulfill the Gospel Commission by impacting commitment and action for Jesus Christ in both clergy and lay persons through research and development of creative ideas and concepts for materials and methodologies to equip people with…
The mission of the Hart Interdenominational Ministry is to connect people in need with churches and social agencies that will provide the appropriate help, support and education that will not only meet the present need but will enable them…
Produced plays and performances for the community using resources of over 400 volunteers, actors, stage crews and organizers
To compassionately engage, educate, and inspire our community with the truth regarding sexual integrity and the value of human life.
The organization provides financial assistance to persons in need with rent, utilities, temporary lodging, prescription medicine, medical care, as well as food and hygiene
Provide medical educational, and spiritual help to poor in eastern europe, with a focus on ukraine; equip christian leaders and christian churches.
Through healing, building, and educating, Servant Harts exists to provide high quality care to malnourished babies and pregnant women in and around San Lorenzo, El Tejar.
To help children in need by providing clothing and school supplies at the start of the school year
To create a public garden that will be a place of beauty in Hart County, providing education, enrichment and enjoyment to all who visit.
Construction of affordable housing for deserving qualifying families; necessary home repairs for low-income individuals at no cost to the homeowner.
To promote, encourage and support programs and projects of hart high school
To encourage the appreciation, study, and performance of musical arts; to provide musical performances inclusive of concerts and theatrical events to members of our immediate and surrounding counties, and to provide local high school and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hart Regional Arts Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sid Luke Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 227 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harold Warren Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.