Skip to content

· Private foundation

Harold B & Dorothy a Snyder Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$434k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.5MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$398kInternational$357kArts & Culture$220kReligion$123kHousing & Shelter$114kYouth Development$103kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $225k
$37,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR HOPE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE$75,000
JOHN F KENNEDY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$50,000
CHILDRENS SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC$50,000
SETON HALL UNIVERSITY$50,000
ST ELIZABETH UNIVERSITY$45,000
COVENANT HOUSE$40,550
NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION$37,500
YOUNGLIFE$24,000
CARING CONTACT$17,750
MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC$15,000
ELIZABETHPORT PRESBYTERIAN CENTER$10,500
KEAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$8,206
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
IMAGINE CENTER FOR COPING WITH A LOSS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $316k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COVENANT HOUSE: $41k → 17%MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 5%MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 5%MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 5%COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY: $44k → 10%FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $40k → 10%ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $50k → 10%ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $50k → 10%ELIZABETH COALITION TO HOUSE THE HOMELESS: $25k → 10%ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Harold B & Dorothy a Snyder Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Harold B & Dorothy a Snyder Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 26 repeat orgs$502k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
14

Total granted

$3.7M
$456k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+19%

Still filing today

58%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $364k · revenue +58%
  • KU
    KEAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $212k · revenue +88%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • SE
    Saint Elizabeth University
    one grant, 2019 · $122k · revenue +3%
  • MC
    MERCY CENTER - SISTERS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $57k
  • BL
    BOXWOOD LEARNING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rwj Barnabas Health Inc

Rwj barnabas health, inc. operates as the parent entity of a tax-exempt multi-entity healthcare system. the organization coordinates, supervises and ensures the continuation and improvement of the quality of healthcare services in a cost…

Health
2
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…

Health
3
St Joseph's Health System Subordinate Group Return

We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.

—
4
Jersey City Medical Center

The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…

Health
5
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center

The spirit that infuses newark beth israel medical center and children's hospital of new jersey is its commitment to excellence. our mission is to achieve this excellence through: - the delivery of primary health care to all who need our…

Health
6
Saint Peter's University Hospital

Keeping faith with the teachings of the roman catholic church and guided by the bishop of metuchen, saint peter's university hospital is committed to humble service to humanity, especially the poor, through competence and good stewardship…

Health
7
Children's Specialized Hospital

To be the preeminent provider of specialized healthcare services for infants, children and young adults. the organization provides medically necessary pediatric healthcare services to all children in a non-discriminatory manner regardless…

Health
8
Saint Peters Healthcare System Inc

Saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is a not for-profit holding company based in new brunswick, new jersey. saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is the sole corporate member of a number of not for-profit entities and the sole…

—
9
Saint Barnabas Medical Center

Saint barnabas medical center, a non-sectarian healthcare institution, will pursue the delivery of primary, secondary, and tertiary health services while consistently meeting the highest quality of care and meeting our customers'…

Health
10
Monmouth Medical Center

To meet the healthcare needs of our community by providing cost-effective quality care. to educate present and future generations of healthcare providers. to provide a continuum of regional tertiary care. please refer to the organization's…

Health
11
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Rahway

To deliver safe, quality, cost effective healthcare services, providing access and value to the community through a unified effort that meets individual needs with dignity and respect. through its dynamic, strategic partnerships, robert…

Health
12
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Emmanuel Cancer Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $363,500 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITYBLOOMFIELD COLLEGE OF MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY INC: $173,500 · OtherBLOOMFIELD COLLEGE OF MONTCLAIR STATE UN…ST ELIZABETH UNIVERSITY: $172,500 · OtherST ELIZABETH UNIVERSITYJFK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $125,044 · OtherJFK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONCENTER FOR HOPE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $100,000 · OtherCENTER FOR HOPE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CAR…NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY: $95,337 · OtherNEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY UNIVE…COVENANT HOUSE: $82,855 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSEJEFFERSON PARK PRESCHOOL: $81,075 · OtherJEFFERSON PARK PRESCHOOLELIZABETHPORT PRESBYTERIAN CENTER INC: $69,500 · OtherMERCY CENTER - SISTERS ACADEMY: $57,000 · Other+8 more: $160,480 · Other+8 moreCHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDAT…DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $350,000 · HealthDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTRINITAS FOUNDATION: $327,000 · HealthTRINITAS FOUNDATIONJOHN F KENNEDY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $230,000 · HealthJOHN F KENNEDY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO…+2 more: $35,000 · HealthKEAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $212,272 · EducationKEAN UNIVERSITY FO…Newark Boys Chorus School: $201,050 · EducationNewark Boys Chorus…Saint Elizabeth University: $122,253 · EducationSaint Elizabeth Un…FOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $113,246 · EducationFOUNDATION AT NJ I…+1 more: $15,000 · EducationST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $125,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC: $43,700 · Human ServicesMOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC: $41,300 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $40,550 · Human ServicesFamily and Children's Services Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesElizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE: $59,848 · Youth DevelopmentBOXWOOD LEARNING CENTER INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Clubs of Union County Inc: $43,500 · Youth DevelopmentCONTACT WE CARE INC: $91,434 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,000 · ReligionTHE OLD FIRST HISTORIC TRUST INC: $11,600 · Arts & CultureUnion Township Historical Society: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,480,791Health$1,442,000Education$663,821Human Services$315,550Youth Development$153,348Religion$98,434Arts & Culture$19,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $363,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTRINITAS FOUNDATION: $327,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetKEAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $212,272 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetNewark Boys Chorus School: $201,050 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetBLOOMFIELD COLLEGE OF MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY INC: $173,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $125,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetSaint Elizabeth University: $122,253 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $113,246 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONTACT WE CARE INC: $91,434 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $59,848 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOXWOOD LEARNING CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC: $43,700 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Union County Inc: $43,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC: $41,300 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $40,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily and Children's Services Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFamily Resource Associates Inc: $31,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetIMAGINE A CENTER FOR COPING WITH LOSS: $30,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetElizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ37.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Ej Grassmann Trust · Investors Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Elizabethtown Healthcare Foundation · Ucsb Charitable Foundation Inc · The Provident Bank Foundation · Union Foundation · The Summit Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold B & Dorothy a Snyder Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold B & Dorothy a Snyder Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Family and Children's Services Inc: 78% of income from government
  • Covenant House New Jersey Inc: 34% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Boxwood Learning Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Family Resource Associates Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Saint Elizabeth University: 2% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harold B & Dorothy a Snyder Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harold B & Dorothy a Snyder Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harold B & Dorothy a Snyder’s filings →

More from the funding graph