Loading…
· Private foundation
HAROLD & SHIRLEY ROBINSON FOUNDATION
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$25k
Granted FY2024
3
Grants
2
Communities
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
International$34kArts & Culture$25kHealth$22kHuman Services$5kPhilanthropy$5kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$37k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
film
2024
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$639k
Total assets
Largest grants
- FRIENDS OF THE IDF$10,000
- HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON$10,000
- JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY$5,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County
To strengthen jewish identity, energize the relationship with israel and meeting human needs that are uniquely the obligation of the jewish community.
Philanthropy
2
Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc
As part of the baptist health network, the mission of boca raton regional hospital is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is…
Health
3
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc
To manage a continuum of senior care business lines.
Health
4
The Jewish Federation of
To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.
Philanthropy
5
Jewish Family Services of Broward
To raise and distribute funds for the benefit of jewish family services of broward county, inc.
Philanthropy
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
Philanthropy
7
B Nai B Rith
The global voice of the jewish community, advancing human rights and community service since 1843.
—
8
Boston Jewish Film Inc
The organization celebrates the richness of the jewish experience through film and media. throughout the year, the festival engages and inspires the community to explore the full spectrum of jewish life, values and culture.
—
9
American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra
To raise funds to support the operations and secure the israel philharmonic's financial future.
Arts & Culture
10
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc
To provide the highest level of skilled nursing and rehabilitation services.
Health
11
Jewish Federation of Greater Houston
The Jewish Federation of Greater Houston mobilizes and activates initiatives and relationships to promote Houston's Jewish future through fund development and resource allocations, collaborative network initiatives, and community…
—
12
Jgs Administrative Services Inc
To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of South Palm and the most unlike its peers is Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$37,000International$34,000Arts & Culture$25,000Health$21,500Human Services$5,000Philanthropy$5,000Community Improvement$2,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARTISTS 4 ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds WNET ↗
- Who funds HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BROWARD COUNTY FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADOPTIONS TOGETHER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation HAROLD & SHIRLEY ROBINSON FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc — 0% of income from government
- Adoptions Together Inc Dba As Paths — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ARTISTS 4 ISRAEL.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 800415734 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ARTISTS 4 ISRAEL, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Harold & Shirley Robinson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Harold & Shirley Robinson Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines