Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harold and Renee Berger Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$86k
Granted FY2018
25
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Education$73kReligion$21kArts & Culture$14kPhilanthropy$13kCivil Rights$3kInternational$2kAnimals$256Public Benefit$255Other$0
02FY2018 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k22 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $72k
$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$198k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$38,225
GERMANTOWN JEWISH CENTER$20,600
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA$13,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH CENTER$5,118
PHILADELPHIA CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY$1,500
CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GERSHMAN Y$1,000
HIAS$900
1807 & FRIENDS$650
EGOPO CLASSIC THEATRE$250
JONAS BERGER MEMORIAL FUND$250
JEWISH HERITAGE SOCIETY$250
KTA ACADEMY$180
Individual grant recipient$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%GERSHMAN Y: $1k → 22%GERSHMAN Y: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$32k · 10 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$32k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+78%

Still filing today

80%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CultureCivil RightsEducationInternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +62%
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +191%
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $256 · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +78%
  • RC
    ROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $300
  • II
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SPACE LAW
    one grant, 2017 · $240

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
4
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
8
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
9
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
10
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
American Philosophical Society

The American Philosophical Society, the oldest learned society in the United States, was founded in 1743 by Benjamin Franklin for the purpose of "promoting useful knowledge." In the 21st century the Society sustains this mission in three…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of the American Revolution and the most unlike its peers is Ego Po Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $72,162 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA+2 more — $265 · EducationGERMANTOWN JEWISH CENTRE — $21,272 · OtherGERMANTOWN JEWISH CENTREJEWISH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA — $13,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIAIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · Other+12 more — $2,868 · Other+12 moreWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $5,118 · Arts & CultureCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $2,750 · Arts & CulturePhiladelphia Chamber Music Society — $1,500 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $843 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $2,750 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE OF SEVENTY — $125 · Civil RightsHIAS INC — $2,400 · InternationalPHILADELPHIA JEWISH FILM AND MEDIA — $2,000 · Human ServicesZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $256 · Animals
Education$72,427Other$39,140Arts & Culture$10,211Civil Rights$2,875International$2,400Human Services$2,000Animals$256

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $72,162 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $5,118 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA JEWISH FILM AND MEDIA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPhiladelphia Chamber Music Society — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $256 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS — $215 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION — $143 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE OF SEVENTY — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST MOUNT AIRY NEIGHBORS INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harold and Renee Berger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 88%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harold and Renee Berger Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harold and Renee Berger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph