· Private foundation
Harold & Marjorie Rosenberry Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $61k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $305k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEWCOMERSTOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $27,928 |
| TUSCARAWAS COUNTY BENEFIT FUND | $25,000 |
| KENT STATE UNIVERSITY AT TUSCARAWAS | $25,000 |
| TUSCARAWAS PUBLIC LIBRARY | $25,000 |
| VILLAGE OF BALTIC FIRE & RESCUE | $21,900 |
| TWIN CITY PARKS & WATERWAYS INC | $20,000 |
| OHIO OUTDOOR HISTORICAL DRAMA ASSOCIATION | $17,000 |
| CITY OF DOVER | $16,000 |
| VILLAGE OF DENNISON | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| DENNISON RAILROAD DEPOT MUSEUM | $15,000 |
| TUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA | $15,000 |
| ALPINE HILLS MUSEUM | $15,000 |
| OHIO GUIDESTONE | $12,000 |
| TUSCARAWAS SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS | $10,342 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $187k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $47k · revenue +11%
- TVTUSCARAWAS VALLEY TROJAN BOOSTER CL2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +77%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EAST CENTRAL OHIO2× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- SFSTRASBURG FIRE ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2022 · $42k · revenue -80%
- BTBeneath The Shadeone grant, 2022 · $29k · revenue -4%
- HTHARCATUS TRI-COUNTY CAO INCone grant, 2021 · $26k · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide medical and pharmaceutical care to the working uninsured residents of tuscarawas county, ohio. it will also provide health education, referrals and patient advocacy.
Maintain genealogical library at dennison ohio
To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs
The organization's mission is to educate and promote interest in agriculture, household arts, and livestock for residents of tuscarawas county ohio.
To preserve the history of tamaqua, pa
Maintain historical society
The mission of the united way of tuscarawascounty inc is to invest in local programs and services thateffectively improve the lives of tuscarawas county residents.
Research, preservation and dissemination of the history of the Township of Tewksbury, Hunterdon County, State of New Jersey.
Local historical education operation of a museum and provision of education relating to the history of tioga county pennsylvania
Maintain union city in/oh historic structures
Will actively collaborate, educate, and coordinate social and health services of tuscarawas and surrounding counties to establish effective relationships to improve access and integrated care for the communities
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Outdoor Historical Drama Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Twin City Parks and Waterways Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STRASBURG FIRE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OHIO OUTDOOR HISTORICAL DRAMA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Beneath The Shade ↗
- Who funds NEWCOMERSTOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HARCATUS TRI-COUNTY CAO INC ↗
- Who funds Dennison Railroad Depot Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds DOVER SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Twin City Parks and Waterways Inc ↗
- Who funds TUSCARAWAS VALLEY TROJAN BOOSTER CL ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY'S END MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Reeves Foundation · Doris & Floyd Kimble Foundation · Blair E & Anna L Zimmerman Foundation Trust · Haman Family Foundation Oag #98-1135 · Dewey H & Irene G Moomaw Foundation Trust · Tuscarawas County Community Foundat · Timken Foundation of Canton · Stark Community Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harold & Marjorie Rosenberry Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.