Skip to content
Harmon Recovery Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Harmon Recovery Foundation

Provide financial assistance to drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities as well as to individuals in need of financial assistance to attend rehabilitation programs.

$256k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$435kEducation$221kHousing & Shelter$60kAnimals$15kCrime & Legal$8k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $250,010, the rows itemized in this filing. The $256,010 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$336k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OZANAM INN$60,000
UNIV OF TX MD ANDERSON CENTER$50,000
THE RANCH RECOVERY CENTER INC$40,000
MIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION$40,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
IMAGINE FAMILY RECOVERY$20,000
ABC RECOVERY CENTER INC$10,010
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $25k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$375k · 4 repeat orgs$354k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +181% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$375k
$214k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+181%
+31%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’23’24
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RANCH RECOVERY CENTERS INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $215k · revenue +191%
  • MH
    MIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue -29%
  • IF
    IMAGINE FAMILY RECOVERY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $45k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF TX MD ANDERSON CANCER
    one grant, 2023 · $51k
  • MD
    M D ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +31%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alcoholic Recovery Center of Lubbock Inc

The alcoholic recovery center is a loving, nurturing homless shelter for men trying to come back from the depths of alcoholism and drug addiction. our mission is to help men who have problems with alcohol and/or drug addictions rebuild…

—
2
Dawns House Corporation Llc

Dawns house provides support to displaced women who are recovering from addiction and alcoholism through structured, guided, sober transitional housing. dawns house operates a home in bend with 7 beds. it is one of only two public sober…

Philanthropy
3
Alcohol & Drug Abuse Council for the Concho Valley

The alcohol and drug abuse council for the concho valley's mission is to save lives and create healthier communities.

—
4
Mfi Recovery Center Inc

None

—
5
Drug Recovery Inc

To provide a comprehensive continuum of behavioral health services, grounded in evidence, responsive to personal need, and empowering personal change for those who have been affected by substance use or co-occurring disorders.

Health
6
Tarzana Treatment Centers Inc

Tarzana treatment centers' (ttc) mission is to provide high quality, integrated health care that improves the quality of life and health of patients regardless of financial resources, and contributes to a reduction in the total cost of…

Health
7
Addiction Recovery Inc

To provide substance use and co-occurring disorder treatment in a supportive recovery community that helps to give people back to themselves.

Health
8
Council On Addiction Recovery Services

The prevention and treatment of alcoholism and substance abuse and associated disorders.

—
9
House of Hope for Recovery Inc

Rehabilitation of adult alcoholics and drug addicts.

—
10
Housing for Recovery

Housing for recovery is dedicated to providing safe, stable, and supportive housing environments for individuals navigating substance use and mental health challenges. through structured recovery housing settings, the organization promotes…

Health
11
Crossroads Recovery House
—
12
D & a Detox Center Inc

Drug and alcohol rehabilition in a clean and sober living environment. provide medically supervised detoxification services for addicts

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abc Recovery Center; the most unlike its peers is ProKids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RANCH RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $215,000 · OtherTHE RANCH RECOVERY CENTERS INCMIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherMIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATIONUNIV OF TX MD ANDERSON CANCER: $51,206 · OtherUNIV OF TX MD ANDERSON CANCERUNIV OF TX MD ANDERSON CENTER: $50,000 · OtherUNIV OF TX MD ANDERSON CENTERIMAGINE FAMILY RECOVERY INC: $45,000 · OtherIMAGINE FAMILY RECOVERY INCABC RECOVERY CENTER: $35,010 · OtherABC RECOVERY CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTC: $20,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $15,000 · OtherM D ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATION: $50,000 · HealthM D ANDER…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,282 · HealthAMERICAN …OZANAM INN: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterOZANAM IN…COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $25,000 · Human ServicesK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $15,000 · AnimalsDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyProKids: $7,500 · Civil Rights
Other$561,216Health$60,282Housing & Shelter$60,000Human Services$25,000Animals$15,000Philanthropy$10,000Civil Rights$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RANCH RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $215,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetOZANAM INN: $60,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetM D ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABC RECOVERY CENTER: $35,010 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFELLOWSHIP CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,282 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetProKids: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harmon Recovery Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harmon Recovery Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harmon Recovery Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harmon Recovery Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harmon Recovery’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home