· Public charity
Harmon Recovery Foundation
Provide financial assistance to drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities as well as to individuals in need of financial assistance to attend rehabilitation programs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $250,010 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $256,010 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OZANAM INN | $60,000 |
| UNIV OF TX MD ANDERSON CENTER | $50,000 |
| MIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| THE RANCH RECOVERY CENTER INC | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| IMAGINE FAMILY RECOVERY | $20,000 |
| ABC RECOVERY CENTER INC | $10,010 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +181% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE RANCH RECOVERY CENTERS INC3× · 2017–2024 · $215k · revenue +191%
- MHMIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue -29%
- IFIMAGINE FAMILY RECOVERY INC2× · 2023–2024 · $45k
Funded once
- UOUNIV OF TX MD ANDERSON CANCERone grant, 2023 · $51k
- MDM D ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +31%
- CHCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANSone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The alcoholic recovery center is a loving, nurturing homless shelter for men trying to come back from the depths of alcoholism and drug addiction. our mission is to help men who have problems with alcohol and/or drug addictions rebuild…
Dawns house provides support to displaced women who are recovering from addiction and alcoholism through structured, guided, sober transitional housing. dawns house operates a home in bend with 7 beds. it is one of only two public sober…
The alcohol and drug abuse council for the concho valley's mission is to save lives and create healthier communities.
None
Tarzana treatment centers' (ttc) mission is to provide high quality, integrated health care that improves the quality of life and health of patients regardless of financial resources, and contributes to a reduction in the total cost of…
To provide a comprehensive continuum of behavioral health services, grounded in evidence, responsive to personal need, and empowering personal change for those who have been affected by substance use or co-occurring disorders.
To provide substance use and co-occurring disorder treatment in a supportive recovery community that helps to give people back to themselves.
Rehabilitation of adult alcoholics and drug addicts.
The prevention and treatment of alcoholism and substance abuse and associated disorders.
Housing for recovery is dedicated to providing safe, stable, and supportive housing environments for individuals navigating substance use and mental health challenges. through structured recovery housing settings, the organization promotes…
Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abc Recovery Center and the most unlike its peers is ProKids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE RANCH RECOVERY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OZANAM INN ↗
- Who funds M D ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ABC RECOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ProKids ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harmon Recovery Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Harmon Recovery Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Harmon Recovery Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.