Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hara Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$579kEducation$16kInternational$8kHuman Services$6kCivil Rights$5kEnvironment$3kEmployment$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$535k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lake Avenue Church$15,151
Friends Of VAlor International Scho$5,000
InterVarsity Chriatian FellowshipUS$1,500
Arborspring Ministries$1,200
Naomi House$1,200
Redeemer Community Partnership$1,200
Pasadena Community Foundation$1,000
Feeding America$600
Doctors WO Borders$500
San Gabriel Christian School$500
International Rescue Committee$500
PBS SoCal$400
Southern California Public Radio$400
National Park Foundation$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Human Good Foundation: $2k → 14%Human Good Foundation: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$619k · 23 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

$619k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+20%

Still filing today

17%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WEST COVINA CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $506k
  • LA
    LAKE AVENUE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF PASADENA
    6× · 2017–2025 · $49k
  • SG
    San Gabriel Christian School
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k

Funded once

  • JA
    Japanese American Citizens League
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • BG
    Be Group Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • AP
    Axia Project
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Geographic Society

To increase and diffuse geographic knowledge in the broadest sense, using the power of science, exploration, education and storytelling to illuminate and protect the wonder of the world.

Education
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
9
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
10
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
11
Rescape California

ReScape addresses climate change by providing a regenerative, nature-based whole systems foundation for landscaping education, workforce development and policy.Foundational to our work is a whole systems watershed framework that…

Environment
12
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Axia Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST COVINA CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $505,972 · OtherWEST COVINA CHRISTIAN CHURCHLAKE AVENUE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF PASADENA: $48,651 · OtherLAKE AVENUE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF PASADENA+39 more: $77,974 · Other+39 moreHUMANGOOD FOUNDATION WEST: $2,200 · Human ServicesTREEPEOPLE INC: $2,100 · EnvironmentInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $1,500 · ReligionRedeemer Community Partnership: $1,200 · Youth DevelopmentInternational Rescue Committee INC: $900 · InternationalBRIGHT FUTURES CAMBODIA: $300 · InternationalPasadena Community Foundation: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$632,597Human Services$2,200Environment$2,100Religion$1,500Youth Development$1,200International$1,200Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMANGOOD FOUNDATION WEST: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRedeemer Community Partnership: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAxia Project: $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES CAMBODIA: $300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUMANGOOD FOUNDATION WEST ↗
  • Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds Redeemer Community Partnership ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Axia Project ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES CAMBODIA ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hara Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hara Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hara’s filings →

More from the funding graph