Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hancock Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$97k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$89k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$1.9MEducation$1.2MHealth$555kHuman Services$276kPhilanthropy$262kHousing & Shelter$175kYouth Development$120kReligion$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $89k
$3,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CCVI$89,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS$3,750
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$3,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUARDIAN AD-LITEM ANGELS IN ACTION: $20k → 16%TRUE LIGHT FAMILY RESOURCES CENTER: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 19 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
36

Total granted

$3.6M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+12%

Still filing today

26%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +230%
  • DL
    DELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $258k · revenue +109%
  • FA
    FRESH AIR HOME INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $22k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • SC
    SAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +26%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED
    one grant, 2022 · $139k
  • SP
    ST PAULS EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL KANSAS CITY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Ruth

House of ruth helps women, children and families in greatest need and with very limited resources to build safe, stable lives and achieve their highest potential. serving the district of columbia since 1976, house of ruth provides…

Housing & Shelter
2
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
3
United Methodist Ministry With Children and Families Inc

Methodist childrens homes seeks to bring restoration to children and youth who have been neglected or abused. by the end of their time with us, we hope to see that they find reconciliation with their biological families, love within an…

Human Services
4
Lighthouse for the Homeless

The only free day shelter in the area comprised of a collection of community agencies and service providers, all focused on a single mission: ending homelessness in tarrant county.

Human Services
5
Methodist Children's Home

Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.

Human Services
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
8
The Lighthouse for the Blind in New Orleans Inc

To empower people with disabilities through employment, services and advocacy.

Health
9
Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition
10
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
11
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
12
David's House Ministries

To provide quality care, facilities and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and program…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Della Lamb Community Services and the most unlike its peers is Guardian Ad Litem Angels in Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceIndependent K-8 SchoolsDevelopmental Disabilities …Homeless Services & ShelterAnimal Rescue and AdoptionAt-Risk Youth MentoringCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr9%29%35–55yr13%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr9%70%35–55yr13%26%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,276

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

METRO LUTHERAN MINISTRIES — $592,481 · OtherMETRO LUTHERAN MINISTRIESCCVI — $247,170 · OtherCCVICENTER FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $139,492 · OtherCENTER FOR VISUALLY IMPAIREDIndividual grant recipient — $110,000 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL KANSAS CITY — $100,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI — $100,000 · OtherNEWHOUSE SHELTER RENOVATION — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $85,244 · Other+33 more — $881,574 · Other+33 moreAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC — $1,840,435 · Food & NutritionAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGI…+1 more — $25,000 · Food & NutritionSAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $150,000 · EducationWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY — $101,250 · EducationTHE MATTHEW REARDON CENTER FOR AUTISM INC — $50,000 · EducationPARK UNIVERSITY — $18,750 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationDELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES — $257,925 · PhilanthropyBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthAmethyst Place Inc — $20,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 · HealthHELPING HANDS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $25,000 · AnimalsLOOP IT UP SAVANNAH INC — $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,455,961Food & Nutrition$1,865,435Education$325,000Philanthropy$257,925Health$47,500Animals$25,000Arts & Culture$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC — $1,840,435 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetDELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES — $257,925 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetSAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY — $101,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI — $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY — $66,383 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Whole Person Inc — $61,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEWHOUSE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE MATTHEW REARDON CENTER FOR AUTISM INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE NETWORK OF RAYTOWN — $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHELPING HANDS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOOP IT UP SAVANNAH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetUNION MISSION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRESH AIR HOME INC — $22,201 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetELEVATE SAVANNAH — $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAmethyst Place Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPARK UNIVERSITY — $18,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrue Light Family Resource Center — $1,890 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC
  • Who funds DELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds SAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY
  • Who funds The Whole Person Inc
  • Who funds NEWHOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE MATTHEW REARDON CENTER FOR AUTISM INC
  • Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOPE NETWORK OF RAYTOWN
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds LOOP IT UP SAVANNAH INC
  • Who funds UNION MISSION INC
  • Who funds FRESH AIR HOME INC
  • Who funds ELEVATE SAVANNAH
  • Who funds Amethyst Place Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO27.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Savannah Community Foundation Inc · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The Hodge Foundation Inc · Victor E Speas Foundation · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · The Francis Family Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hancock Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph