Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hampton Foundation of Manhattan

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$356k
Granted FY2020
46
Grants FY2020
11
States reached
$125k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

68% of Hampton Foundation of Manhattan’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 16 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Hampton Foundation of Manhattan named its own grantees at scale: 34 organizations, $356k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

30
’19
34
’20
24
’21
18
’22
19
’23
18
’24
16
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHealth$202kFood & Nutrition$161kPublic Safety & Disaster$134kYouth Development$114kEnvironment$48kInternational$31kArts & Culture$30kOther$0
02FY2020 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k38 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL$125,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$50,000
NYC SALT INC$30,000
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION$20,000
PLEIADES NETWORK FOR FORK IN THE ROAD$20,000
HIMALAYAN HEALTH CARE INC$10,000
GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION$10,000
GLOBAL HEALTH WORKS FOUNDATION$10,000
GIFT OF LIFE$5,000
ZERO FOODPRINT$5,000
CITY SEED INC$5,000
THE FAMILY SCHOOL$5,000
THE HUN SCHOOL OF PRINCETON$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%THE ELWYN FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THE FAMILY SCHOOL: $5k → 14%THE FAMILY SCHOOL: $2k → 14%THE FAMILY SCHOOL: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ID
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
KY
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$890k · 43 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
9

Total granted

$890k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+81%

Still filing today

77%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHealthEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA CTY FIREFIGHTERS BEN FND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $124k · revenue +368% · 35% of their budget
  • NS
    NYC SALT INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $106k · revenue +41%
  • THE HUN SCHOOL OF PRINCETON
    6× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • The Ocean Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +87%
  • MO
    MIRACLE ON CRAIG STREET
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • TC
    The Civilians Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Sweet Farm Foundation

Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…

Animals
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Elwyn Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/49
Grantees still filing
40/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $750,524 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIATHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $50,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NE…+6 more: $79,500 · Education+6 moreUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL: $125,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITALPLEIADES NETWORK FOR FORK IN THE ROAD: $115,000 · OtherPLEIADES NETWORK FOR FORK IN THE RO…THE SYV FAMILY SCHOOL: $110,000 · OtherTHE SYV FAMILY SCHOOLMUSICAL MASTERWORKS INC: $22,505 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE LOS ALAMOS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherHIMALAYAN HEALTHCARE INC: $28,500 · OtherSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $22,500 · Other+29 more: $116,624 · Other+29 moreSANTA BARBARA CTY FIREFIGHTERS BEN FND: $123,500 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNYC SALT INC: $106,400 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR MILERS: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentGLOBAL HEALTHWORKS FOUNDATION: $42,500 · HealthSTERN CENTER FOR LANGUAGE AND LEARNING: $17,000 · HealthTRANSPLANT FOUNDATION: $13,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $8,000 · Health+2 more: $3,000 · HealthEARTHJUSTICE: $12,000 · EnvironmentTOMPKINS CONSERVATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentNATUREBRIDGE: $7,000 · EnvironmentThe Ocean Foundation: $5,000 · EnvironmentSHELBURNE FARMS: $3,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 · Environment+3 more: $2,500 · EnvironmentCITY SEED INC: $17,500 · Food & NutritionZERO FOODPRINT: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS & PANTRIES INC: $5,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Education$880,024Other$580,129Public Safety & Disaster$125,500Youth Development$110,400Health$83,500Environment$42,000Food & Nutrition$33,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $750,524 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA CTY FIREFIGHTERS BEN FND: $123,500 over 7y, 35% of budgetNYC SALT INC: $106,400 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTHWORKS FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 7y, 13% of budgetHIMALAYAN HEALTHCARE INC: $28,500 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetTHE HUN SCHOOL OF PRINCETON: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC: $24,250 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMUSICAL MASTERWORKS INC: $22,505 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCITY SEED INC: $17,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSTERN CENTER FOR LANGUAGE AND LEARNING: $17,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPOLK EDUCATION FOUNDATION AND BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTRANSPLANT FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $10,225 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ELWYN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMPKINS CONSERVATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZERO FOODPRINT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FAMILY SCHOOL: $8,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLYME AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS & PANTRIES INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BERRY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetJUNIOR MILERS: $4,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetARTS OUTREACH: $3,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSHELBURNE FARMS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIsla Vista Youth Projects Inc dba LEAP LearnEngageAdvocatePartner: $3,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDWIGHT SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALM INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC: $1,875 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Civilians Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLYME LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $474 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA CTY FIREFIGHTERS BEN FND ↗
  • Who funds NYC SALT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HEALTHWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUN SCHOOL OF PRINCETON ↗
  • Who funds LEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSICAL MASTERWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds CITY SEED INC ↗
  • Who funds STERN CENTER FOR LANGUAGE AND LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds POLK EDUCATION FOUNDATION AND BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds GLYNWOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ELWYN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOMPKINS CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds ZERO FOODPRINT ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATUREBRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds LYME AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS & PANTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GIFT OF LIFE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BERRY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YELLOW FARMHOUSE EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR MILERS ↗
  • Who funds ARTS OUTREACH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation IncCT24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc · The Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · Santa Barbara Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Newcomb-Hargraves Foundation · The Big Wood Foundation · The Morris & Bessie Altman Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Marin Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hampton Foundation of Manhattan funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hampton Foundation of Manhattan. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • City Seed Inc: 87% of income from government
  • Lyme Land Conservation Trust Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Yellow Farmhouse Education Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms: 3% of income from government
  • Florence Griswold Museum Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Stern Center for Language and Learning: 0% of income from government
  • The Hun School of Princeton: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hampton Foundation of Manhattan’s filings →

More from the funding graph