Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hamilton Roddis Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$393k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$700kInternational$445kEnvironment$365kHealth$340kHuman Services$238kPublic Benefit$228kPhilanthropy$219kSocial Science$160kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $370k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION$45,000
NASHOTAH HOUSE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$35,000
BRADLEY IMPACT FUND$30,000
INSTITUTE FOR REFORMING GOVERNMENT$30,000
ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$30,000
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$30,000
PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$20,000
DEFENSE ORIENTATION CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION (DOCA)$17,500
PAX AMERICANA INSTITUTE$15,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$15,000
WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$12,500
CENTER OF THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $40k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $40k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $35k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20k → 11%THE PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
KS
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Hamilton Roddis Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 60%.

Hamilton Roddis Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 32 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
12

Total granted

$2.7M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+60%

Still filing today

69%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPublic BenefitHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $365k · revenue +124% · 94% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $233k · revenue +39%
  • PD
    PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +60%
  • MS
    MAYFLOWER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MARSHFIELDWOOD COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
3
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
8
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
9
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
12
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institute for Reforming Government Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pax Americana Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENGINEERING WORLD HEALTH: $280,000 · OtherENGINEERING WORLD HEALTHNASHOTAH HOUSE: $190,000 · OtherNASHOTAH HOUSEHOPE LODGE CANCER CENTER: $85,000 · OtherHOPE LODGE CANCER CENTERFRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · OtherFRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITYAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $160,000 · OtherAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RES…BADGER INSTITUTE INC: $65,000 · Other+31 more: $538,500 · Other+31 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $232,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WI…INSTITUTE FOR REFORMING GOVERNMENT INC: $95,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR RE…Pax Americana Institute Inc: $55,000 · EducationPax Americana In…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRU…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $365,000 · Arts & CultureCAMP FIVE MUS…MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $190,000 · HealthMARSHFIEL…MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · HealthMARSHFIEL…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $225,000 · Human ServicesBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $199,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $20,000 · PhilanthropyDefense Orientation Conference Association: $135,000 · InternationalENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC: $30,000 · International
Other$1,398,500Education$437,500Arts & Culture$380,000Health$255,000Human Services$225,000Philanthropy$219,000International$165,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $365,000 over 8y, 94% of budgetENGINEERING WORLD HEALTH: $280,000 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $232,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $225,000 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $199,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $190,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $160,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDefense Orientation Conference Association: $135,000 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR REFORMING GOVERNMENT INC: $95,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBADGER INSTITUTE INC: $65,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY: $42,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN SQUASH TWIN CITIES: $42,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetCenter of the American Experiment: $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC: $38,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLiving Church Foundation Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EPISCOPAL SCHOOLS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCY BURNS INSTITUTE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOODSON CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEFENDING EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN INNOVATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetState Financial Officers Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP FIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERING WORLD HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Defense Orientation Conference Association ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR REFORMING GOVERNMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BADGER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY ↗
  • Who funds URBAN SQUASH TWIN CITIES ↗
  • Who funds Center of the American Experiment ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds Living Church Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EPISCOPAL SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LUCY BURNS INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bradley Impact Fund IncWI27.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Adolph Coors Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Gordon R Connor Charitable Foundation Inc · The Searle Freedom Trust · State Policy Network · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · McP Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hamilton Roddis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hamilton Roddis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hamilton Roddis Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hamilton Roddis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hamilton Roddis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph