Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hambrick Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2022
24
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Hambrick Family Foundation Inc’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Hambrick Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $19k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’17
14
’18
15
’19
13
’20
14
’21
16
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$459kArts & Culture$34kReligion$16kHuman Services$15kYouth Development$13kEducation$8kHealth$7kCrime & Legal$7kOther$0
02FY2022 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WALK WITH ME$1,200
EXODUS HOMES$1,000
YOUNG PEOPLE OF INTEGRITY INC$1,000
COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY$1,000
HICKORY MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
SAFE HARBOR$1,000
YOUNG LIFE OF CATAWBA VALLEY$1,000
CATAWBA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH$1,000
HICKORY CHORAL SOCIETY$1,000
CATAWBA SCIENCE CENTER$1,000
HICKORY COMMUNITY THEATRE$1,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$1,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY & PROTECTION CENTER$1,000
WESTERN PIEDMONT SYMPHONY$1,000
HICKORY MUSIC FACTORY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $500 → 12%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 12%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER: $500 → 12%FAMILY CARE CENTER: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 25 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
2

Total granted

$105k
$2k

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HICKORY MUSEUM OF ART INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $11k · revenue +24%
  • HC
    HICKORY COMMUNITY THEATRE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $7k · revenue +21%
  • WR
    WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER
    5× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +193%

Funded once

  • CV
    CATAWBA VALLEY YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HICKORY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hickory Christian Academy Inc

Education for grades k thru 12

Education
2
Hickory Soup Kitchen Inc

To help relieve hunger in our community. we recognize that the total needs of individuals must be addressed, and will seek to facilitate the meeting of other needs. however, our primary purpose is that of providing nutritious meals to the…

—
3
United Way of Horry County Inc

To unite people, ideas, and resources to advance the common good in horry county

Philanthropy
4
United Arts Council of Catawba County Inc

Advancing the cultural life of catawba county through grants, marketing and fundraising

Arts & Culture
5
Chattanooga Symphony & Opera Association

To provide high-quality musical presentations and educational programs in the chattanooga area

Arts & Culture
6
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
7
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
8
Family Services Inc

Origin sc empowers individuals to achieve financial, housing and mental health stability through advocacy, counseling, and education.

—
9
Haywood Pathways Center Inc

Guided by faith, love, and respect, we provide food, shelter, and individualized supportive services for Haywood County residents.

Housing & Shelter
10
Carolina Family Connections

Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.

Human Services
11
Wilkes Senior Resources Inc

To provide services, education, and information that promote quality of life and active aging for senior citizens.

Human Services
12
Williamson County Children's Advocacy Center Inc

To provide a safe place to report child abuse, reduce the emotional trauma for children and non-offending family members, and extend professional services to protect the intergrity of an investigation.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hickory Community Theatre Inc; the most unlike its peers is Walk With Me Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $456,199 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyCOOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY: $11,500 · OtherCOOPERATIVE…HICKORY CHORAL SOCIETY: $7,500 · OtherHICKORY CHO…County of Catawba: $6,000 · OtherCounty of C…YOUNG PEOPLE OF INTEGRITY INC: $5,500 · OtherYOUNG PEOPL…CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY & PROTECTION CENTER: $3,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S …YOUNG LIFE OF CATAWBA VALLEY: $3,500 · OtherYOUNG LIFE …LEA'S CHAPEL METHODIST CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherLEA'S CHAPE…SAFE HARBOR: $3,000 · OtherSAFE HARBORHICKORY PLAYGROUND INC: $2,500 · OtherNEWTON-CONOVER CITY SCHOOLS: $2,500 · OtherHICKORY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2,500 · Other+5 more: $5,000 · Other+5 moreHICKORY MUSEUM OF ART INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureHICKORY COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureWESTERN PIEDMONT SYMPHONY INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHICKORY MUSIC FACTORY INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureCATAWBA SCIENCE CENTER INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $5,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY CARE CENTER OF CATAWBA VALLEY INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesBARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 · Human ServicesCATAWBA COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 · EducationFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentWALK WITH ME INC: $1,200 · Recreation & SportsEXODUS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Health
Philanthropy$458,699Other$56,000Arts & Culture$30,000Human Services$14,000Education$3,000Youth Development$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,200Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $456,199 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHICKORY MUSEUM OF ART INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHICKORY CHORAL SOCIETY: $7,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetHICKORY COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $5,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetWESTERN PIEDMONT SYMPHONY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHICKORY MUSIC FACTORY INC: $4,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCATAWBA SCIENCE CENTER INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCATAWBA COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY CARE CENTER OF CATAWBA VALLEY INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCATAWBA COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEXODUS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds HICKORY MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds HICKORY CHORAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HICKORY COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN PIEDMONT SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds HICKORY MUSIC FACTORY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATAWBA SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CATAWBA COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CARE CENTER OF CATAWBA VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CATAWBA COUNTY UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds BARIUM SPRINGS HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds WALK WITH ME INC ↗
  • Who funds EXODUS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Foundation IncNC30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Beaver Family Foundation Inc · Corning Incorporated Foundation · Tsh Charitable Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation · Underdown Family Foundation · The Bolick Foundation · Service League of Hickory Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · United Arts Council of Catawba County Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hambrick Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hambrick Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hambrick Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph