Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hamaker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$75kEducation$49kHealth$35kHousing & Shelter$17kCivil Rights$15kSocial Science$8kAnimals$4kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$190k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EARTH JUSTICE$10,000
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN$2,500
ST JUDES RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,000
VA KIDS CENTER$1,500
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
MARKET STREET MISSION$500
WOUNDED WARRIOR$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VA KIDS CENTER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 18 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
23

Total granted

$167k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
0%

Still filing today

50%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHealthCivil RightsInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EARTHJUSTICE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $28k · revenue +82%
  • LO
    LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +388%
  • LO
    LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND
    2× · 2018–2019 · $13k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • LE
    LVC EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • RA
    ROSEMARY ANDERSON HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WI ECONOMICS FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Watttime Corporation

To raise awareness about the potential to reduce environmental harm by shifting electricity use to particular times; to encourage the development and spread of common protocols for this practice.

Science & Tech
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Biotechnology Innovation Organization

The biotechnology innovation organization (bio) represents approximately 1,000 companies and organizations in washington dc, state capitals, and international fora. bio is founded on the principle that policy must nurture innovation in the…

—
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is League of Conservation Voters Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boost Oregon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EARTH JUSTICE: $21,250 · OtherEARTH JUSTICEABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONBUILD JAKES PLACE: $16,500 · OtherBUILD JAKES PLACELCV EDUCATION FUND: $15,000 · OtherLCV EDUCATION FUNDLVC EDUCATION FUND: $10,000 · OtherLVC EDUCATION FUNDTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,500 · OtherROSEMARY ANDERSON HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $4,500 · Other+22 more: $27,025 · Other+22 moreEARTHJUSTICE: $28,250 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICELEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $12,500 · EnvironmentLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION …CLEAN WATER FUND: $2,700 · EnvironmentCLEAN WATER FUND+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $17,500 · Civil RightsLEAGUE OF…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $6,075 · EducationCornell University: $5,000 · EducationBOOST OREGON: $2,500 · EducationGeneration Mental Health Association: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $4,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthBUILDON INC: $2,500 · InternationalVA KIDS CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE ASHER HOUSE: $1,000 · Animals
Other$125,775Environment$44,450Civil Rights$17,500Education$14,825Health$8,500International$2,500Human Services$1,500Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $28,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $6,075 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND: $2,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDON INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOST OREGON: $2,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetVA KIDS CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ASHER HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOPE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
  • Who funds BUILDON INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOST OREGON ↗
  • Who funds VA KIDS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Generation Mental Health Association ↗
  • Who funds THE ASHER HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GREEN CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds COPE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hamaker Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hamaker Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Boost Oregon: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hamaker Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hamaker Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hamaker Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph