Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hall Financial Advisors Giving Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$147k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$182kFood & Nutrition$131kEducation$114kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kReligion$15kHuman Services$10kHousing & Shelter$10kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$3,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIETTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$50,500
MARIETTA CITY SCHOOLS$21,781
FORT FRYE LOCAL SCHOOLS$10,000
OLD MAN RIVERS FOOD PANTRY$10,000
GOSPEL MISSION FOOD PANTRY$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
WARREN LOCAL SCHOOLS$6,140
PARKERSBURG COUNTRY CLUB$5,197
HOUSE TO HOME$4,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO$3,500
WV SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA PARKERSBURG$3,500
HUNGER SOLUTION MID-OHIO VALLEY$2,500
PARKERSBURG HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
PARKERSBURG SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%RITCHIE COUNTY FRN: $1k → 20%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 10 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +201% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
18

Total granted

$429k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+201%
+10%

Still filing today

40%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MARIETTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $176k · revenue +26%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +229%
  • TB
    THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO
    2× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +201%

Funded once

  • RC
    RENO CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • LF
    LEAVITT FUNERAL HOME
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • PV
    PARCHMENT VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marietta Health Foundation

The memorial health foundation encourages philanthropic support of marietta memorial hospital and related services. activities include raising funds, fund stewardship and making grants to improve health care in the mid-ohio valley.

Health
2
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
3
Mt Washington Childrens Center

Childrens day care center

Human Services
4
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
5
Kansas City Country Club

The kansas city country club is a traditional, private, family-oriented country club dedicated to providing outstanding year-round dining, social and athletic activities to its members and their guests through superior services, staff and…

—
6
Woodstock Club

Woodstock club is a private, family oriented country club committed to providing exceptional food and service, outstanding recreational facilities and delightful social events in our historic setting.

—
7
Marinette County Group Home Association Inc

To provide supervised housing and treatment to clients who require assistance with mental, cognitive, and physyical aspects of their lives to attain an optimal quality of life.

Human Services
8
Bakersfield Country Club

Membership - country club.bakersfield country club is a private family club, providing social and recreational activities for the benefit of its members and their guests. the club is committed to maintain its reputation for excellence and…

—
9
Women's Center of Beaver County

Counseling, advocacy, and shelter services for victims of domestic and sexual violence in beaver county. also, prevention and education programs for the community.

Human Services
10
Wayne County Humane Society

Finding committed, permanent homes for companion animals in our community; measurably reducing companion animal overpopulation; educating and promoting humane values.

Animals
11
Members of Church of Christ for Scouting

In addition to the mission statement noted on Page 1, Part 1, MCCS is an organization independent of but recognized by the Boy Scouts of America, Girl Scouts USA, Trail Life USA, and American Heritage Girls programs. Our Servant Leadership…

—
12
Community Financial Credit Union

Community financial credit union is a state chartered, not-for-profit, full-service financial institution owned and governed by its membership. at community financial, we are committed to our members and our communities,for over 70 years.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marietta Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wood County Christian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARIETTA CITY SCHOOLS: $91,178 · OtherMARIETTA CITY SCHOOLSOLD MAN RIVERS FOOD PANTRY: $65,000 · OtherOLD MAN RIVERS FOOD PANTRYGOSPEL MISSION FOOD PANTRY: $59,939 · OtherGOSPEL MISSION FOOD PANTRYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $17,750 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS+28 more: $73,921 · Other+28 moreMARIETTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $175,500 · HealthMARIETTA MEMORIAL HOSPITALWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $6,500 · HealthMARIETTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO: $3,750 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesRITCHIE COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesHUNGER SOLUTIONS MID-OHIO VALLEY: $2,500 · Food & NutritionWOOD COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $2,500 · Education
Other$307,788Health$182,000Philanthropy$6,000Youth Development$3,750Human Services$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,500Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARIETTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $175,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMARIETTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARKERSBURG COUNTRY CLUB: $5,197 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO: $3,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOOD COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNFS MINISTRIES: $2,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETSEY MILLS CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRITCHIE COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMarietta Welfare League: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARIETTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIETTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKERSBURG COUNTRY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER SOLUTIONS MID-OHIO VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds WOOD COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NFS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BETSEY MILLS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds RITCHIE COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKSKIN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Marietta Welfare League ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund IncWV19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Peoples Bank Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hall Financial Advisors Giving Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hall Financial Advisors Giving Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hall Financial Advisors Giving Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hall Financial Advisors Giving Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hall Financial Advisors Giving’s filings →

    More from the funding graph