Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hall Charles and Isabel Fdn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$208kEducation$171kHealth$134kRecreation & Sports$98kFood & Nutrition$26kHuman Services$15kHousing & Shelter$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$387k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP ASCCA$10,000
CHAUNCEY CHRISTIAN CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TAYLOR RIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$5,000
MILLFIELD CHRISTIAN CHURCH$5,000
GREENS RUN CHRISTIAN CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
MA
IN
OH
KY
VA
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$488k · 12 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$488k
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+44%

Still filing today

25%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED
    3× · 2020–2022 · $131k · revenue +37%
  • CA
    CAMP ASCCA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $88k
  • MC
    MILLFIELD CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $48k

Funded once

  • NC
    NORWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $160k
  • PC
    PARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +64%
  • GR
    GREEN RUN BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

—
2
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
3
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
4
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
Meals On Wheels of Central Marylandinc

Meals on wheels of central maryland's charitable mission, to keep homebound people living safely and independently at home through the provision of nutritious meals, personal contact and support services, reduces hospitalization, and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
8
Tampa Bay Hunger Relief Center Inc

To support feeding america tampa bay, inc. d/b/a feeding tampa bay

Food & Nutrition
9
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Meals On Wheels Inc

Meals on wheels is the leading privately funded organization promoting dignity and independent living for the homebound, through volunteer delivery of nutritious meals in the greater indianapolis area.

Food & Nutrition
11
Meals On Wheels of Palestine Inc

Providing meals to the elderly

—
12
Hospice of Medina County

Hospice of medina county provides palliative end-of-life care, caregiver support, and bereavement services throughout northern ohio. in celebration of the individual worth of each life, we strive to relieve suffering, enhance comfort,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prayers From Maria Children's Glioma Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $160,000 · OtherNORWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED: $131,040 · OtherHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATEDCAMP ASCCA: $88,000 · OtherCAMP ASCCAMILLFIELD CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $48,000 · OtherMILLFIELD CHRISTIAN CHURCHTAYLOR RIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $46,000 · OtherTAYLOR RIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCHCHAUNCEY CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $46,000 · OtherCHAUNCEY CHRISTIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $45,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREENS RUN CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $35,000 · Other+11 more: $74,200 · Other+11 morePARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $8,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · InternationalHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterPRAYERS FROM MARIA CHILDREN'S GLIOMA CANCER FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$673,740Human Services$15,000International$10,500Housing & Shelter$5,000Health$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED: $131,040 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPeaslee Neighborhood Center Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAYERS FROM MARIA CHILDREN'S GLIOMA CANCER FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds Peaslee Neighborhood Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAYERS FROM MARIA CHILDREN'S GLIOMA CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hall Charles and Isabel Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hall Charles and Isabel Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hall Charles and Isabel Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph